Showing posts with label Hassan M Fattah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hassan M Fattah. Show all posts

Saturday, October 6, 2007

Bin Laden, on Tape, Urges Pakistanis to Oust Musharraf

Published: September 21, 2007

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 20 — In a recording released Thursday, Osama bin Laden urged Muslims in Pakistan to rise up against Gen. Pervez Musharraf, the president, whom he called an apostate for deciding to storm the Red Mosque in Islamabad to evict Islamist militants.

The mosque attack in July “demonstrated Musharraf’s insistence on continuing his loyalty, submissiveness and aid to America against the Muslims,” said Mr. bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda. He said it had made “removing him an obligation.”

The recording, an audio track accompanied by previously released videotape, was the third attributed to Mr. bin Laden in the last month. It was released on Web sites frequented by militants just weeks before presidential elections in Pakistan.

Al Qaeda has released video and audio recordings for the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. It released a documentary on Thursday in which Mr. Zawahri said America was losing in Afghanistan and Iraq.

from

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/21/world/asia/21qaeda.html

Saudis Rethink Taboo on Women Behind the Wheel

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 27 — In a recent episode of Saudi Arabia’s most popular television show, broadcast during Ramadan this month, a Saudi man of the future is seen sitting in his house as his daughter pulls into the driveway, her children piled into the back of the car.

LBC International

On a Saudi TV series, a woman in disguise drives a cab.

“Where have you been?” the father asks.

“The kids were bored, so I took them to the movies,” she replies, matter-of-factly, as she gets out of the driver’s seat.

The scene may appear mundane, but in Saudi Arabia, where women are forbidden to drive — and, by the way, where there are no movie theaters, either — the skit portends something of a revolution. From a taboo about which there could be no open discussion, a woman’s right to drive is becoming a topic of growing and lively debate in Saudi Arabia.

Coming after other recent changes — women may now travel abroad without male accompaniment (though male permission is still required), seek divorce and own their own companies — the driving discussion is noteworthy. Whether it signals that women will actually be driving soon or merely talking about it openly remains to be seen.

“We are telling everyone this is coming, whether today or tomorrow,” said Abdallah al-Sadhan, producer, writer and host of “Tash Ma Tash” (“No Big Deal”), a variety comedy show that is broadcast during Ramadan and tackles controversial social issues in Saudi Arabia. Other episodes have also shown women driving in what Mr. Sadhan says is a deliberate message. “There will be a time we will accept it, so now is the time to get prepared for that.”

In another popular Saudi show, “Amsha Bint Amash” (“Amsha, Daughter of Amash”), a woman who loses her father is forced to move to the city, where she masquerades as a man to become a taxi driver.

Saudi newspapers have begun writing about the implications and acceptability of having women drive. The Saudi National Human Rights Association has begun researching the effect of women’s driving on families and Saudi society, activists said.

A group of Saudi women have led a petition drive asking the king to repeal the ban on driving by women, placing the issue at the heart of a discussion about modernity and Saudi Arabia’s place in the world. And the government, which was hostile toward the last such petition in 1990, now seems mildly receptive.

“You get the feeling that they are preparing the population for this issue,” said Wajeha al- Huwaider, 45, one of the organizers. “It is just like the decision to allow women education. They resisted it, but now it’s a reality.”

On Sunday, Ms. Huwaider and some 1,100 other women sent the petition to King Abdullah.

Some Saudi officials and religious men agree with the women that Islam does not forbid women to drive. In the past, Saudi women were able to move freely on camel and horseback, and Bedouin women in the desert openly drive pickup trucks far from the public eye.

Clerics and religious conservatives maintain that allowing women to drive would open Saudi society to untold corruption. Women alone in a car, they say, would be more open to abuse, to going wayward, and to getting into trouble if they had an accident or were stopped by the police. The net result would be an erosion of social mores, they say.

In 1990, a group of prominent Saudi women seized on the presence of Western news media covering the first Persian Gulf war, boarded cars and drove through a Riyadh boulevard. Several of the women were jailed briefly; many lost high positions in schools and universities, and others were forced to leave the country for some time.

This time, however, the women are being given wide latitude to make their case, Ms. Huwaider said. She believes that this is because the case is being made in pragmatic social and economic terms, not purely as a matter of women’s rights.

Because of the rising cost of living in Saudi Arabia, women have been entering the work force in large numbers. That in turn has given them new economic clout in the family and greater leverage.

Ebtihal Mubarak, another organizer of the petition drive, who is an editor at Arab News, an English-language daily newspaper, said the cost of a driver had begun to impinge on Saudi families. “Most middle-class people can’t afford drivers anymore,” she said.

Saudi women say the seeming momentum behind the issue is fueled in part by what they can now see and read about the freedoms of women abroad on satellite television and the Internet. They also feel they have become more sophisticated in dealing with the Saudi system.

“This is more organized and is a real campaign,” said Khalid Al-Dakhil, professor of political sociology at King Saud University in Riyadh. “They have been on the Net, sending out e-mails.”

Still, few expect any change to come soon. Ms. Huwaider said the group had so far received no reply from the palace to the petition. Even women’s rights advocates said lifting ban would mean much preparation and public education, for women and men.

“Fifty years ago, we rejected the mail and then we advanced,” said Mr. Sadhan, the television producer. “We refused radio, only to accept it, and then rejected TV, and only to accept that, too. We will accept women driving some day all the same, and the environment has to be prepared for it.”

Rasheed Abou-Alsamh contributed reporting from Jidda, Saudi Arabia.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/world/middleeast/28drive.html?ref=world

Car Bomb Near Beirut Kills Christian Lawmaker

Antoine Ghanem, a prominent Christian member of Parliament and backer of Lebanon’s prime minister, Fouad Siniora, died when a bomb in a parked car went off as he drove by in a Christian suburb of the capital. Six other people also died.

Published: September 20, 2007

BEIRUT, Lebanon Sept. 19 — A powerful car bomb in a Christian neighborhood just east of Beirut killed a Christian lawmaker from the governing coalition and six others Wednesday evening. It was the latest in a deadly string of bombings that have rocked Lebanon’s teetering political order as the country prepares to select a new president.

Skip to next paragraph
Joseph Barrak/AFP-Getty Images

Lebanese army soldiers at the scene of a car bomb in a Christian suburb of Beirut on Wednesday.

Toufic Chebib/Agence France Press - Getty Images

A bombing with political overtones rattled a suburb of Beirut and raised tensions as Parliament is set to meet.

Mohamed Azakir/Reuters

Antoine Ghanem had returned to Beirut just two days before he was killed.

The bombing appeared to have deep political implications, giving credence to longstanding fears of a plot to eliminate the governing March 14 movement’s razor-thin majority in Parliament.

The bomb, apparently hidden inside a parked car in the Sin el Fil neighborhood, exploded just as the lawmaker, Antoine Ghanem of the Christian Phalange Party, drove past. The explosion ripped through the busy street, crushing cars and damaging buildings nearby, in a scene now eerily familiar in this politically tense city.

Mr. Ghanem, 64, and his bodyguard died instantly, security officials said, and five passers-by were also killed. At least 19 others were wounded, medical workers and security officials said.

“It went dark, then a blinding light followed,” said Toufic Shabib, who owns a flower shop near the bombing site. “I ran outside. Everything was burning — cars, people. It was like a war zone.”

The blast raised concerns that Lebanon’s political turmoil might be taking a turn for the worse as Parliament prepares to meet next week for the first time in almost a year. The legislators plan to take up one of the most significant tests in this severely divided country: to deliberate over the choice of a new president to replace Émile Lahoud, who must step down on Nov. 25.

Lebanon has been locked in a 10-month political stalemate between the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and the Hezbollah-led opposition, backed by Iran and Syria. The opposition, in part trading on Hezbollah’s popularity after its war with Israel a year ago, has been demanding a greater role in government.

Lebanon has faced one security threat after another, with seven car bombings in the capital this summer while the army battled Al Qaeda-inspired militants in a Palestinian refugee camp in northern Lebanon.

In Washington, the White House condemned the attack and strongly suggested that Syria was behind it, though the press secretary, Dana M. Perino, stopped short of directly accusing Syria. “There has been a pattern of political assassinations and attempted assassinations designed to intimidate those working courageously toward a sovereign and democratic Lebanon,” Ms. Perino said. “The victims of these cowardly attacks have consistently been those who publicly sought to end Syria’s interference in Lebanon’s internal affairs.”

It was not immediately clear how the assassination would affect the political process or the March 14 movement’s narrowing majority in Parliament.

Some analysts said the assassination might be part of a plot to eliminate the governing coalition’s majority by assassination.

Mr. Ghanem was the fourth anti-Syrian lawmaker and the eighth leader assassinated since a huge blast killed former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, setting off a cycle of political crises. A number of lawmakers, apparently nervous about the situation, have been outside of the country in recent weeks. Mr. Ghanem had been away and had returned only two days before.

With Mr. Ghanem’s death, March 14 will control 67 out of the 128 seats in Parliament; to elect a president outright, it must have a majority of 65. “What is clear is that there is someone working on depriving the majority of its majority,” said Ziad Baroud, an independent Lebanese lawyer. It was unlikely that an election to replace Mr. Ghanem could be held before next week’s expected parliamentary session. “These assassinations are connected to the presidential election,” he said.

Last November, Pierre Gemayel, a Parliament member with the March 14 movement, was assassinated by gunmen on a busy street; in June, Walid Eido, a Sunni Muslim member and an outspoken critic of Syria, died in a bombing. March 14 members blame Syria for the killings.

In a significant blow last month, an opposition candidate, Kamil Khoury, defeated a former president, Amin Gemayel, the father of Pierre, in a pivotal election to fill his son’s vacant seat.

Mr. Khoury is allied with a Christian rival of the governing coalition, Michel Aoun, a former general who has, in turn, made common cause with the opposition Shiite Muslim Hezbollah Party and led a single-minded quest to become president.

In Damascus, a statement by a “media source,” quoted by the official news agency, SANA, condemned the assassination on Wednesday as an act that “targets the efforts and endeavors exerted by Syria and others to achieve the Lebanese national accord.”

Mahdi Dakhalallah, Syria’s former information minister, said in a telephone interview, “This could be destabilizing for Lebanon, Syria and the whole region.” He added, “I hope this event will be more reason for Lebanese to go and vote to elect a new president for national unity.”

Nada Bakri reported from Beirut, and Hassan M. Fattah from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Hugh Naylor contributed reporting from Damascus, Syria, and Steven Lee Myers from Washington.

from

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/world/middleeast/20lebanon.html?ref=world