Showing posts with label Arab news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arab news. Show all posts

Friday, May 16, 2008

In Qatar, Muslim, Jewish clerics meet

In Qatar, Muslim, Jewish clerics meet

DOHA, Qatar (AP) — More than a dozen Jewish rabbis, including two from Israel, were in attendance this week as this conservative Muslim sheikdom opened one of the Gulf's first scholarly centers dedicated to interfaith dialogue.

The rare meeting of Muslim, Christian and Jewish scholars in the heartland of conservative Islam is another sign of Qatar's efforts to present a moderate image as it bids for the 2016 summer Olympic Games. It's also part of a broader push by Arab governments for interfaith dialogue, even though most still do not recognize Israel.

The talks were not entirely smooth, and politics and disputes over the Palestinian issue did inevitably intrude, said Rabbi David James Lazar, leader of a synagogue in Tel Aviv.

Yet, the benefits for him were huge, he said — especially the ability to make personal connections with Arabs and Muslims "who otherwise I would have no contact with."

"For some it's their first chance ever to hear, not only an Israeli but to hear a Jewish rabbi speak ... And so one of my responses is trying to tell them the story of the Jewish people, which often they have not heard. The Holocaust," he said.

"I hear their story as well," he said. "It's an exchange of stories."

Another attendee, Rabbi Herschel Gluck, chairman of the Muslim Jewish Forum in Britain, commended Qatar for "being brave" by holding the conference.

"We know that hosting rabbis and an interreligious forum can be controversial in the region," said Gluck, whose group is based in a part of London where Jewish and Muslim communities sit side by side.

Some Qataris did criticize the gathering.

"This openness to other faiths creates confusion among our people and jeopardizes our identity," said one preacher at the local Fanar Islamic center, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

But other Qataris consider this and other changes made by Sheik Hamad bin Jassem bin Jabr al Thani as progressive and credit him for social and economic reforms since 1995.

Two months ago, the country also allowed the opening of its first-ever Catholic church. It has had low-level ties with Israel through a trade office for 12 years although it does not recognize Israel, and recently also invited Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to speak at a conference on democracy.

Ibrahim al-Nuaimi, the director of the interfaith center sponsored by the ruling family, said the goal is to "promote joint studies of academics from three faiths to foster understanding and peace."

Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, who heads Vatican's council for inter-religious dialogue and attended the conference, praised Qatar's efforts to include Jews.

"As religious leaders, let us promote a sound pedagogy of peace, which is taught in the family, mosques, synagogues and churches," Tauran said.

Efforts at interfaith dialogue got one of their biggest boosts when Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah met with Pope Benedict XVI last November at the Vatican.

In March, the Saudi king then made an impassioned plea for dialogue among Muslims, Christians and Jews — the first such proposal from a nation with no diplomatic ties to Israel and a ban on non-Muslim religious services and symbols.

The moves, however, come amid rising tensions in the region and with peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians stalled. Many also believe there is a growing gap of understanding between the Muslim Arab world and the West.

Muslims have been angered by cartoons published in European papers seen as insulting the Prophet Muhammad and by the pope's baptizing on Easter of a Muslim journalist who had converted to Catholicism.

The specifics of the Saudi king's initiative — and who would participate — still remain unclear, in particular whether Israeli religious leaders would be invited to a Saudi-brokered dialogue.

It also is unclear if the Saudi efforts would have any political component, or any eventual impact on stalled Arab-Israeli and Palestinian peace talks.

Lazar, the Tel Aviv rabbi, said he is no politician but will carry his warm impressions from the conference back to his students and synagogue — as he hopes Muslim clerics will, too.

Lazar said one Palestinian researcher at the conference confronted him about Israeli textbooks that were, in his words, promoting hatred of Palestinians among Israeli Jewish children.

"My challenge to him was, let us meet together ... and together we'll look at our textbooks, the Jewish textbooks, the Muslim textbooks and the Christian textbooks in Palestine and Israel — and together we'll find if they're educating children toward hate," he said.

Associated Press writers Pakinam Amer in Cairo, Egypt, and Aron Heller in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

Zemanta Pixie

Arab League talks seek to defuse Lebanon crisis
Hezbollah agrees to end blockade of airport; feuding factions to meet on power-sharing deal
May 16, 2008

Middle East Bureau

BEIRUT–Words finally replaced bullets here yesterday, as Lebanon's feuding factions once again prepared to settle their bitter differences in a semblance of peace – or at least to try.

"We want dialogue to save Lebanon's independence, integrity and institutions," Sheikh Naeem Qassem, deputy secretary general of Hezbollah, said in a televised address. "We want to work hand in hand in order to build a new Lebanon."

An Arab League delegation helped broker a truce yesterday between Lebanon's ruling coalition and several opposition factions, following nearly a week of intense and deadly armed combat between the two sides.

Under the deal, Hezbollah was to remove its blockade of Beirut's seaport and international air terminal, withdraw its gunmen from the streets, and agree not to use military force as a political tool in future.

Representatives of different Lebanese political and religious factions were expected to meet in Doha, Qatar, today for peace talks aimed at reaching agreement on power sharing and the drafting of a new electoral law.

Qassem said yesterday he welcomed a decision announced late Wednesday by Lebanon's pro-Western government to revoke a pair of security-related decisions that last week plunged the country into its worst spate of internal violence since the civil war that raged here from 1975 to 1990.

Yesterday, Lebanese information minister Ghazi Aridi said the government's change of heart should not be seen as caving in to armed pressure by Hezbollah and other opposition groups but as a reflection of its concern for the greater good of Lebanon.

"Since the government is greatly concerned with the higher interest, the government decided to approve the rescinding of the two decisions," he said in televised remarks.

But there was little doubt the pro-Western administration of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora had indeed been forced to back down after Hezbollah militants overwhelmed the government's own paramilitary forces in several days of fierce street fighting in Beirut and other cities.

Armed clashes erupted in much of Beirut on May 7 after the ruling coalition said it was firing Gen. Wafiq Shouquair, chief of security at Beirut's international airport, because of alleged security breaches and also moving to dismantle Hezbollah's private telecommunications system.

Hezbollah denounced both measures as tantamount to acts of war and promptly sent hundreds of its well-trained fighters into the streets in a bloody show of force that left more than 80 dead and some 250 wounded.

As the Lebanese Armed Forces looked on without intervening, Hezbollah gunmen quickly overwhelmed a patchwork of government militias and soon controlled most of western Beirut.

Having made its point in blood, Hezbollah withdrew without mounting a direct challenge to the government's survival.

"Hezbollah stopped just at the entrance to the Grand Serail," a prominent Lebanese lawyer said, referring to the huge government palace in downtown Beirut.

Yesterday, the streets of the Lebanese capital presented an otherworldly study in contrasts, as urban sophisticates in the fashionable Hamra section of the city chatted on the patio of the Costa coffee bar or perused their laptop computers, as if oblivious to the tanks and soldiers still posted only a block away or at frequent intervals throughout the city.

Hezbollah said yesterday it would begin clearing the mounds of earth and other debris that have blocked many of Beirut's main access roads for more than a week, including the road to the international airport, closed for the past eight days.

Middle Eastern Airlines, Lebanon's flagship carrier, was expected to begin flying its planes back into Beirut late last night.

With a population of 4.2 million, Lebanon has been in a state of near political paralysis for the past 18 months because of bitter squabbling between the government and opposition.

The post of Lebanese president has been vacant since last November because the two sides cannot get together to vote for the position, even though they agree on the same candidate – Lebanese Armed Forces commander Gen. Michel Suleiman.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Morocco's Facebook 'prince' given royal pardon

By Tom Leonard in New York
Last Updated: 2:53am GMT 20/03/2008

A Moroccan internet prankster jailed for pretending to be the brother of the king on the social networking site Facebook has been given a royal pardon.

Human rights groups had expressed outrage after Fouad Mourtada, a 27-year-old computer engineer, was sentenced by a court to three years in jail and fined 10,000 dinar (£650) for "the use of false information and usurping the identity" of Prince Mourlay Rachid.

Mourtada, a graduate of the prestigious Mohammedia Engineers School in Rabat, had insisted he had meant no harm by setting up a Facebook page purporting to belong to King Mohammed VI's younger brother.
advertisement

He said at his trial: "I admire him, I like him a lot and I have never caused him any wrong, it was just a joke. I am innocent."

His lawyer had pointed out that Facebook contained sites for President Sarkozy, George Bush and Tony Blair, as well as sport and film stars, without any proof that they were real.

Amnesty International, which condemned Mourtada's sentence as disproportionate to the offence, had been particularly worried by the judge's claim that he had "undermined the sacred integrity of the realm as represented by the prince".

His release from jail in Casablanca on Tuesday evening followed an international campaign for his release by human rights groups and ordinary internet users.

Reporters Without Borders, a media freedom campaign group, welcomed the royal pardon but added: "Nevertheless, we regret that his liberation was due to a royal pardon and not a fair verdict."

The case illustrates that whatever the internet's generally liberating effect on free speech elsewhere in the world, any sort of criticism or mockery of the royal family remains very risky in Morocco.

Ahmed Benchemsi, a Moroccan journalist, faces up to five years in jail over an article he wrote about one of the king's speeches.

In another official reprieve for another Facebook user, a computer engineering student in Canada learned he would not be expelled for running a study group on the site.

Ryerson University in Toronto decided that Chris Avenir, 18, had been charged with 146 counts of academic misconduct - one for each of the classmates who discussed their course work on his Facebook page.

Information appearing on telegraph.co.uk is the copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited and must not be reproduced in any medium without licence. For the full copyright statement see Copyright

Major Cultural Award in Arab World Announces Winners

Mohamed Benaissa Honoured With 2008 Sheikh Zayed Book Award for Cultural
Personality of the Year
Awards Recognise Contributions to Scholarship and Creative Development in
Arabic Literature at Ceremony in Abu Dhabi

ABU DHABI, UAE, March 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Former Moroccan Minister and
Ambassador to the United States, Mohamed Benaissa has been named Cultural
Personality of the Year in the 2008 Sheikh Zayed Book Award, walking away
with a prize of one million UAE dirham.

Benaissa was recognised for his unique contribution to Arabic culture
and the pioneering role he played in founding the Asilah Festival for arts,
culture and thought at an award ceremony attended by Deputy Crown Prince
Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

The Sheikh Zayed Book Award, an independent award conferred by the Abu
Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage, recognises significant
contributions to Arabic culture in nine diverse categories and is designed
to help foster scholarship and creative development in Arabic culture.

Winners in six other categories were also celebrated for their
achievements in fostering cultural development in the Arab World at the
event in the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi on March 12.

Established in 1978, the Asilah Arts Festival is renowned the world
over as a platform for artists to showcase their works and share ideas. The
festival, held annually in Morocco, is an annual cultural extravaganza
which attracts both studio and performing artists from all over the world,
transforming Morocco into a cultural forum.

Other winners honoured at the ceremony this year were:

- Ibrahim Al Kouni of Libya - Literature

- Huda Al Shawa of Kuwait - Children's Literature

- Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research - Best Publisher-
Distributor

- Dr. Faiz Assayagh of Jordan - Translation

- Rifat Chadirji of Iraq - Architecture

- Dr Mohamed Saadi of Morocco - Young Author

Rashed Al Ureimi, Secretary General of the Sheikh Zayed Book Award
Committee said: 'I would like to congratulate all of the winners for their
contributions to culture in the region and beyond. The quality of the work
we have looked at this year was extremely high.'

Benaissa was awarded one million UAE dirham (around GBP140,000) by the
Sheikh Zayed Book Award Committee in recognition of his individual
achievement with the other winners each receiving 750,000 dirham (around
GBP105,000) for their contributions to culture.

The 2008 Sheikh Zayed Book Awards attracted participation from many
well-known personalities in the Arab cultural arena. The Award Committee
evaluated a total of 512 works from more than 1,200 nominated across the
nine award categories, which represented submissions from more than 30
countries.

Notes to Editors:

About the Sheikh Zayed Book Award for Cultural Personality of the Year

The award is given to a prominent culture figure, Arab or
international, who has made a clear contribution to the enrichment of Arab
culture, creatively or intellectually, and that his/her work or activities
embody the values of originality, tolerance and peaceful co-existence.

About the Sheikh Zayed Book Award Supreme Advisory and Advisory
Committees

The Award Supreme Committee is presided by Sheikh Sultan Bin Tahnoon Al
Nahyan, president of the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage, and
includes Zaki Nassiba, Advisor for the Presidency Office and vice-president
of the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage; Mohammed Khalaf Al
Mazrouei, General Manager of the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and
Heritage; Jumaa Al-Qubeissi, Director of National Books Unit of the
Authority; Mr. Juergen Boos, Director of the Frankfurt International Book
Fair; and Turky Al Dakhail , media personality and author.

In its 2007-2008 session, the Award Advisory Committee includes an
elite of local and Arabic cultural figures. In addition to Mr. Rashed Al
Ureimi, a member and the Secretary General, the committee comprises Dr. Ali
Rashed Al Noaimi of the United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates author
Mohammed Al Mor, Dr. Abdallah Al Gadami of Saudi Arabia, Dr. Radwan Al
Sayed of Lebanon, Dr. Salah Fadl of Egypt, Sheikha Mai Khalifa of Bahrain,
Algerian novelist Waciny Laredj and Dr. Said Ben Said Alaoui of Morocco.

About the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage

The Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage (ADACH) is a
government institution in charge of safeguarding, conserving and promoting
the heritage and culture of Abu Dhabi. The Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture
and Heritage is administered by a Board of Directors chaired by H. E.
Sheikh Sultan bin Tahnoun Al Nahyan.



SOURCE Sheikh Zayed Book Award

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Ex-Moroccan minister Bin Eisa wins Zayed book award

WAM
Published: March 01, 2008, 21:23

Abu Dhabi: Former Moroccan foreign minister Mohammad Bin Eisa has won the Shaikh Zayed Book Award for 2008 in the category of the Cultural Personality of the Year.

In a press release, Secretary-General of the Shaikh Zayed Book Award Rashid Al Uraimi said Bin Eisa has been awarded in recognition of his contributions to the cultural movement as well as for his role as a co-founder of Morocco's Aseelah Culture Season which was launched in 1978 as a forum for Arab, African and western cultural achievers and creative individuals and thinkers.

Bin Eisa will be presented a cash award of Dh1 million along with a certificate of appreciation.

Bin Eisa was born in Aseelah city, Morocco in 1937. He was Morocco's minister of culture between 1985-1992. He then became Morocco's minister of state for foreign affairs and culture between 1999-2007.

A prestigious ceremony will be held at the iconic Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi to honour winners of the second edition of the Shaikh Zayed Book Award (2007-8). The ceremony will be held on the sidelines of the upcoming Abu Dhabi International Book Fair from March 11 to 16.

Another Moroccan researcher and PhD holder won the Shaikh Zayed Book Award in the category of Young Authors for his book Future of international relations in the light of civilizations clash, which was described by the secretary-general as a remarkable contribution to Arab politics and philosophy.

The translation award went to Jordanian Fayez Al Sayagh, while the Arts Award went to Iraqi architect, Rafa Al Jaderji, and Publication and Distribution Award went to the Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research.

The Libyan novelist Ebrahim Al Kowni won the Literature Award, while Huda Al Shawwa, a Kuwaiti, won the Child Literature Award.

In all, 512 candidates from 30 Arab countries contended for the second edition of the Shaikh Zayed Book Awards.
http://archive.gulfnews.com/nation/Heritage_and_Culture/10194100.html

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Morocco dismantles widespread domestic terrorist network

Magharebia
Published on Magharebia‎ (http://www.magharebia.com) ‎
http://www.magharebia.com/cocoon/awi/xhtml1/en_GB/features/awi/features/2008/02/21/feature-01
Morocco dismantles widespread domestic terrorist network

21/02/2008

Investigations into a suspected terrorist network in Morocco led to the arrests of three senior political party officials, Morocco's interior ministry announced on Wednesday. The group, trained in part by Hezbollah, is believed to have links to al-Qaeda.

By Sarah Touahri and Naoufel Cherkaoui for Magharebia in Rabat – 21/02/08

[Sarah Touahri] Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday (February 20th) Interior Minister Chakib Benmoussa said Moroccan investigators have dismantled a "major Jihadist terror network" established in Tangier in 1992.

Moroccan authorities announced Monday (February 18th) that security services had dismantled a "major Jihadist terrorist network, which was preparing to perpetrate acts of violence in the country." Painstaking intelligence work led to the identification and subsequent arrest of the group's main active members.

Interior Minister Chakib Benmoussa told the press on Wednesday that the investigations had uncovered a number of branches of the network, originally established in 1992 in Tangier. The group had connections to terrorist organisations active in Morocco and abroad, including al-Qaeda. Benmoussa said the network was preparing to assassinate top-level civilian and military officials and Moroccan Jewish citizens.

In all, 32 people representing a broad cross-section of society have been detained. Many are educated professionals, one is a police superintendent and three more are senior political party leaders. The network is reportedly led by Moroccan Abdelkader Belliraj, a resident of Belgium.

The interior ministry said searches of the residences and workplaces of members of the "Belliraj Cell" in Casablanca and Nador led to the seizure of large quantities of weapons, ammunitions and explosives, as well as supplies intended to conceal the terrorists' identities.

The ministry added that police helped to identify the sources of financing for the Belliraj cell, including armed robbery, sale of stolen goods, and direct contributions by members. The terrorist organisation also reportedly smuggled some 30 million dirhams into the country in 2001 that were invested in money-laundering endeavours in tourist, real estate and commercial projects in several Moroccan cities. Real estate purchased by the group was also used to house some of the terrorists.

The interior minister also revealed that the group received explosives and arms training from Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2002.

The Moroccan public was perhaps most shocked by the arrests of Secretary-General Mustapha Lmouaatassim and El Amine Regala of the Al-Badil Al-Hadari (Civilised Alternative) party, as well as Mohamed El Merouani, leader of the unrecognised Al Oumma (The Nation) party.

According to the interior minister, the terrorist network was found to be instrumental in the creation of the Al-Badil Al-Hadari party. As a result, Prime Minister Abbas El Fassi decreed the dissolution of the party, under Article 57 of the law governing political parties.

Al-Badil Al-Hadari contributed to the creation of an Islamist association in 1995 before becoming a full-fledged party in 2005. The party fielded candidates in the September 2007 legislative elections but failed to win any seats.

Al Oumma began as a partisan offshoot of Al Haraka Min Ajli Oumma (Movement for the Nation). Founded in 1998, the party applied for government recognition in 2007 but has yet to be approved.

"The creation of the Al-Badil Al-Hadari association in 1995 and Al Haraka Min Ajli Al Oumma in 1998," Chakib Benmoussa explained, "was just a front for the members of the [terrorist] network."

Saad Al Othmani, Secretary-General of the Justice and Development Party expressed his surprise at the arrests, saying the political leaders were "all known for moderation, rejection of violence and extremism, and for working within the framework of institutions and established national principles."

"We are sure that there is some sort of an error," he said, "and we hope it will be corrected."

Meanwhile, Mohamed Moujahid, leader of Morocco's Unified Socialist Party, said the charges are "in contradiction with their stances that call for modernity, democracy and human rights".

Mohamed Ziane, leader of the Moroccan Liberal Party, commented on the case, saying, "Political struggle has nothing to do with violence. The proponents of a culture of violence have no place in politics. This rule applies to both leftist and rightist ideologies."

In a statement issued Tuesday, Ibrahim Borja, Vice-Secretary-General of Al-Badil Al-Hadari condemned Mustapha Lmouaatassim's arrest, describing him and El Amine Regala as proponents of democracy and rejecters of all forms of extremism and terrorism, and called for their immediate release.

He said the arrests were a crackdown on people trying to effect a real democratic transition in Morocco. Mohamed Ben Hammou, leader of the Citizenship and Development Initiative party, said if the allegations prove true, then it is both shocking and frustrating. "Morocco is our country. We should defend it, particularly when we accept a position of political responsibility. We have to be vigilant when it comes to extremism. No one has the right to go down any route other than the democratic one," he declared.

Friday, January 4, 2008

Siniora Cabinet hopes for Arab League help


With an "open ended" vacancy in the presidency likely and the opposition demanding veto powers in any new government before it consents to holding a presidential election, all eyes are on the upcoming Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo on Sunday. French President Nicholas Sarkozy met with Jordan's King Abdullah II in Aqaba Friday. Full Story

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Israel to seize Arab land near Jerusalem

Poll says majority of Israelis oppose Jerusalem sharing plan

JERUSALEM: Israel has ordered the confiscation of Arab land outside east Jerusalem, a newspaper and Palestinian officials said on Tuesday, reviving fears that the occupied West Bank could be split in two.

Issued late September, the order covers 110 hectares (272 acres) in four Palestinian villages between east Jerusalem and the Jewish settlement of Maale Adumim, said Hassan Abed Rabbo, a senior official at the Palestinian local government ministry.

The land could create a bloc of settlements incorporating Maale Adumim and nearby Mishor Adumim and Kedar, and “prevent Palestinian territorial continuity” between the West Bank and Jordan Valley, he said.

The army orders given to landowners, a copy of which was seen by AFP, justified the expropriation on “military grounds” and for “measures designed to stop terrorist acts”. Israel’s Haaretz newspaper said the land was earmarked for a new road that would connect east Jerusalem with the West Bank town of Jericho.

“That in turn would ‘free up’ the E-1 area between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim, through which the current Jerusalem-Jericho road runs, for a long-planned Jewish development consisting of 3,500 apartments and an industrial park,” Haaretz wrote.

The Palestinians heavily criticise the project because it would effectively split the West Bank and separate the territory from east Jerusalem.

“We condemn this Israeli decision to confiscate Palestinian land at a time in which we are trying to revive the peace process,” chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told AFP.

Israelis oppose Jerusalem sharing: More than 60 percent of Israelis oppose sharing sovereignty over Jerusalem with the Palestinians as part of a final peace deal, in a poll published on Tuesday.

Asked if Israel should agree to “any sort of compromise on Jerusalem” as part of a final deal, 63 percent said no, compared with 21 who said yes, according to the poll published in the mass-selling Yediot Aharonot daily.

Sixty-eight percent oppose transferring Arab neighbourhoods in occupied east Jerusalem to Palestinian sovereignty, compared with 20 percent who are in favour.

Asked who should have sovereignty over the holy places in the Old City, 61 percent said Israel alone, 21 percent favoured international sovereignty, and 16 percent supported joint Israeli-Palestinian sovereignty.

On whether Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s government has a mandate from the public to reach a permanent status arrangement on Jerusalem, 52 percent said yes on condition that 80 MPs in the 120-seat parliament supported such a move. afp

from
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C10%5C10%5Cstory_10-10-2007_pg4_3

Sunday, October 7, 2007

THE ARCHITECTS OF WAR: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

President Bush has not fired any of the architects of the Iraq war. In fact, a review of the key planners of the conflict reveals that they have been rewarded — not blamed — for their incompetence.

PAUL WOLFOWITZ

Role In Going To War: Wolfowitz said the U.S. would be greeted as liberators, that Iraqi oil money would pay for the reconstruction, and that Gen. Eric Shinseki’s estimate that several hundred thousand troops would be needed was “wildly off the mark.” [Washington Post, 12/8/05; Wolfowitz, 3/27/03]

Where He Is Now: Bush promoted Wolfowitz to head the World Bank in March 2005. Two years into his five-year term, Wolfowitz was rebuked by the World Bank investigative committee for engineering an unethical pay and promotion package for his girlfriend and, after repeated calls for his resignation, stepped down on May 17, 2007. Wolfowitz is now a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-wing think tank that “has the President’s ear” on national security issues. [Washington Post, 3/17/05, 5/18/07; Financial Times, 6/28/07]

Key Quote: “The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason [for going to war].” [USA Today, 5/30/03]

DOUGLAS FEITH

Role In Going To War: As Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Feith spearheaded two secretive groups at the Pentagon — the Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group and the Office of Special Plans — that were instrumental in drawing up documents that explained the supposed ties between Saddam and al Qaeda. The groups were “created in order to find evidence of what Wolfowitz and his boss, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, believed to be true.” Colin Powell referred to Feith’s operation as the Gestapo. In Bob Woodward’s Plan of Attack, former CentCom Commander Gen. Tommy Franks called Feith the “f***ing stupidest guy on the face of the earth.” [LAT, 1/27/05; NYT, 4/28/04; New Yorker, 5/12/03; Plan of Attack, p.281]

Where He Is Now: Feith voluntarily resigned from the Defense Department shortly after Bush’s reelection. He is currently writing a memoir of his Pentagon work and teaching a course at Georgetown University “on the Bush Administration’s strategy behind the war on terrorism.” The Defense Department’s Inspector General found that Feith’s secretive groups at the Pentagon “developed, produced, and then disseminated” deceptive intelligence that contradicted “the consensus of the Intelligence Community.” These groups are still under investigation by the Senate Intelligence Committee. [Washington Post, 1/27/05;Georgetown press release, 5/1/06; NYT, 2/9/07]

Key Quote: “I am not asserting to you that I know that the answer is — we did it right. What I am saying is it’s an extremely complex judgment to know whether the course that we chose with its pros and cons was more sensible.” [Washington Post, 7/13/05]

STEPHEN HADLEY

Role In Going To War: As then-Deputy National Security Advisor, Hadley disregarded memos from the CIA and a personal phone call from Director George Tenet warning that references to Iraq’s pursuit of uranium be dropped from Bush’s speeches. The false information ended up in Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address. [Washington Post, 7/23/03]

Where He Is Now: On January 26, 2005, Stephen Hadley was promoted to National Security Advisor. [White House bio]

Key Quote: “I should have recalled at the time of the State of the Union speech that there was controversy associated with the uranium issue. … And it is now clear to me that I failed in that responsibility in connection with the inclusion of these 16 words in the speech that he gave on the 28th of January.” [Hadley, 7/22/03]

RICHARD PERLE

Role In Going To War: Richard Perle, the so-called “Prince of Darkness,” was the chairman of Defense Policy Board during the run-up to the Iraq war. He suggested Iraq had a hand in 9-11. In 1996, he authored “Clean Break,” a paper that was co-signed by Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and others that argued for regime change in Iraq. Shortly after the war began, Perle resigned from the Board because he came under fire for having relationships with businesses that stood to profit from the war. [Guardian, 9/3/02, 3/28/03; AFP, 8/9/02]

Where He Is Now: Currently, Perle is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute where he specializes in national security and defense issues. He has been investigated for ethical violations concerning war profiteering and other conflicts of interest. [Washington Post, 9/1/04]

Key Quote: “And a year from now, I’ll be very surprised if there is not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush. There is no doubt that, with the exception of a very small number of people close to a vicious regime, the people of Iraq have been liberated and they understand that they’ve been liberated. And it is getting easier every day for Iraqis to express that sense of liberation.” [Perle, 9/22/03]

ELLIOT ABRAMS

Role In Going To War: Abrams was one of the defendants in the Iran-Contra Affair, and he pled guilty to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress. He was appointed Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs during Bush’s first term, where he served as Bush’s chief advisor on the Middle East. His name surfaced as part of the investigation into who leaked the name of a undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame. [Washington Post, 5/27/03, 2/3/05]

Where He Is Now: Abrams was promoted to deputy national security adviser in February of 2005. In that position, he has led a smear campaign to attack Speaker Nancy Pelosi for visiting Syria. [Slate, 2/17/05; IPS, 4/9/07; Washington Post, 2/15/07]

Key Quote: “We recognize that military action in Iraq, if necessary, will have adverse humanitarian consequences. We have been planning over the last several months, across all relevant agencies, to limit any such consequences and provide relief quickly.” [CNN, 2/25/03]

SCOOTER LIBBY

libby

Role In Going To War: As Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, Libby repeatedly pressured CIA analysts to report that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and links to al Qaeda. He also provided classified government information to New York Times reporter Judith Miller that formed the basis of a series of articles highlighting Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction that were later entirely discredited. Along with Hannah, Libby was a principal author of the discredited draft UN presentation. [Washington Post, 6/5/03; National Journal, 4/6/06; FAIR, 3/19/07; NYT, 10/30/05]

Where He Is Now: On June 5, 2007, Libby was sentenced to 2.5 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for perjury and obstruction of justice for his role in the CIA leak case. On July 2, 2007, Bush commuted Libby’s prison sentence, ensuring he would serve no time in jail. [NYT, 6/5/07; Bush, 7/2/07]

Key Quote: “I’m a great fan of the Vice President,” Libby told Larry King in 2002. “I think he’s one of the smartest, most honorable people I’ve ever met.” [Time, 10/28/05]

JOHN HANNAH

johnhannahpiccropped2.jpg

Role In Going To War: As deputy national security advisor to Vice President Cheney, Hannah served as the conduit between Ahmad Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress and the Bush administration, passing along false information about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction that the administration relied upon to justify the invasion. Hannah was also a principal author of the draft speech making the administration’s case for war to the UN. Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and CIA director George Tenet rejected most of the content of the speech as exaggerated and unwarranted. [Newsweek, 12/15/06; NYT, 10/30/05]

Where He Is Now: On October 31, 2005, Cheney promoted Hannah to national security advisor, replacing the role served previously by Scooter Libby. [CNN, 10/31/05]

Key Quote: Reprising his role in misleading the country to war with Iraq, Hannah has told a U.S. ambassador that 2007 is “the year of Iran” and that a U.S. attack is “a real possibility.” [Washington Post, 2/11/07]

DAVID WURMSER

Role In Going To War: At the time of the war, Wurmser was a special assistant to John Bolton in the State Department. Wurmser has long advocated the belief that both Syria and Iraq represented threats to the stability of the Middle East. In early 2001, Wurmser had issued a call for air strikes against Iraq and Syria. Along with Perle, he is considered a main author of “Clean Break.” [Asia Times, 4/17/03; Guardian, 9/3/02]

Where He Is Now: Wurmser was promoted to Principal Deputy Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs; he is in charge of coordinating Middle East strategy. His name has been associated with the Plame Affair and with an FBI investigation into the passing of classified information to Chalabi and AIPAC. [Raw Story, 10/19/05; Washington Post, 9/4/04]

Key Quote: “Syria, Iran, Iraq, the PLO and Sudan are playing a skillful game, but have consistently worked to undermine US interests and influence in the region for years, and certainly will continue to do so now, even if they momentarily, out of fear, seem more forthcoming.” [Washington Post, 9/24/01]

ANDREW NATSIOS

Role In Going To War: Shortly after the invasion of Iraq, Andrew Natsios, then the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, went on Nightline and claimed that the U.S. contribution to the rebuilding of Iraq would be just $1.7 billion. When it became quickly apparent that Natsios’ prediction would fall woefully short of reality, the government came under fire for scrubbing his comments from the USAID Web site. [Washington Post, 12/18/03; ABC News, 4/23/03]

Where He Is Now: Natsios stepped down as the head of USAID in January and was teaching at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh’s School of Foreign Service as a Distinguished Professor in the Practice of Diplomacy and Advisor on International Development. In September 2006, Bush appointed him Special Envoy for Darfur. [AP, 2/20/06; Georgetown, 12/2/05; Washington Post, 9/19/06]

Key Quote: “[T]he American part of this will be $1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this.” [Nightline, 4/23/03]

DAN BARTLETT

bartlett

Role In Going To War: Dan Bartlett was the White House Communications Director at the time of the war and was a mouthpiece in hyping the Iraq threat. Bartlett was also a regular participant in the weekly meetings of the White House Iraq Group (WHIG). The main purpose of the group was the systematic coordination of the “marketing” of going to war with Iraq as well as selling the war here at home. [Washington Post, 8/10/03]

Where He Is Now: Bartlett announced his resignation on June 1, 2007 to pursue his “prospects in the private sector.” He was promoted to Counselor to the President on January 5, 2005, and was responsible for the formulation of policy and implementation of the President’s agenda. [Washington Post, 6/2/07]

Key Quote: “Most people would argue we are part of the solution in Iraq, not part of the problem.” [CNN, 10/23/06]

MITCH DANIELS

Role In Going To War: Mitch Daniels was the director of the Office of Management and Budget from January 2001 through June of 2003. In this capacity, he was responsible for releasing the initial budget estimates for the Iraq War which he pegged at $50 to $60 billion. The estimated cost of the war, including the full economic ramifications, is approaching $1 trillion. [MSNBC, 3/17/06]

Where He Is Now: In 2004, Daniels was elected Governor of Indiana. [USA Today, 11/3/04]

Key Quote: Mitch Daniels had said the war would be an “affordable endeavor” and rejected an estimate by the chief White House economic adviser that the war would cost between $100 billion and $200 billion as “very, very high.” [Christian Science Monitor, 1/10/06]

GEORGE TENET

Role In Going To War: As CIA Director, Tenet was responsible for gathering information on Iraq and the potential threat posted by Saddam Hussein. According to author Bob Woodward, Tenet told President Bush before the war that there was a “slam dunk case” that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction. Tenet remained publicly silent while the Bush administration made pre-war statements on Iraq’s supposed nuclear program and ties to al Qaeda that were contrary to the CIA’s judgments. Tenet issued a statement in July 2003, drafted by Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, taking responsibility for Bush’s false statements in his State of the Union address. [CNN, 4/19/04; NYT, 7/22/05]

Where He Is Now: Tenet voluntarily resigned from the administration on June 3, 2004. He was later awarded a Presidential Medal of Freedom. He released a memoir in April 2007 critical of many in the Bush administration for their roles in the Iraq war and currently teaches at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh’s School of Foreign Service. [Washington Post, 6/3/04; CBS, 4/29/07]

Key Quote: “It’s a slam dunk case.” [CNN, 4/19/04]

COLIN POWELL

Role In Going To War: Despite stating in Feb. 2001 that Saddam had not developed “any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction,” Powell made the case in front of the United Nations for a United States-led invasion of Iraq, stating that, “There can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more. And he has the ability to dispense these lethal poisons and diseases in ways that can cause massive death and destruction.” [Powell, 2/5/03; Powell, 2/24/01]

Where He Is Now: Shortly after Bush won reelection in 2004, Powell resigned from the administration. Powell now sits on numerous corporate boards. He succeeded Henry Kissinger in May 2006 as Chairman of the Eisenhower Fellowship Program at the City College of New York. In September 2005, Powell said of his U.N. speech that it was a “blot” on his record. He went on to say, “It will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It’s painful now.” [ABC News, 9/9/05]

Key Quote:
“‘You are going to be the proud owner of 25 million people,’ he told the president. ‘You will own all their hopes, aspirations, and problems. You’ll own it all.’ Privately, Powell and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage called this the Pottery Barn rule: You break it, you own it.” [Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack]

DONALD RUMSFELD

Role In Going To War: Prior to the war, Rumsfeld repeatedly suggested the war in Iraq would be short and swift. He said, “The Gulf War in the 1990s lasted five days on the ground. I can’t tell you if the use of force in Iraq today would last five days, or five weeks, or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that.” He also said, “It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.” [Rumsfeld, 11/14/02; USA Today, 4/1/03]

Where He Is Now: After repeated calls for his resignation, Donald Rumsfeld finally stepped down on November 8, 2006, one day after the 2006 midterm elections. Rumsfeld is now “working on setting up a new foundation…to promote continued U.S. engagement in world affairs in furtherance of U.S. security interests” so that he can “remain engaged in public policy issues.” He is also shopping a memoir, in the hopes of receiving “a large cash advance.” [AP, 11/8/06; Reuters, 3/19/06; Washington Times, 5/18/07; NY Sun, 6/27/07]

Key Quote: “You go to war with the Army you have. They’re not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time.” [CNN, 12/9/04]

CONDOLEEZZA RICE

Role In Going To War: As National Security Adviser, Rice disregarded at least two CIA memos and a personal phone call from Director George Tenet stating that the evidence behind Iraq’s supposed uranium acquisition was weak. She urged the necessity of war because “we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” [Washington Post, 7/27/03; CNN, 9/8/02]

Where She Is Now: In December of 2004, Condoleezza Rice was promoted to Secretary of State. [ABC News, 11/16/04]

Key Quote: “We did not know at the time — maybe someone knew down in the bowels of the agency — but no one in our circles knew that there were doubts and suspicions that this might be a forgery. Of course it was information that was mistaken.” [Meet the Press, 6/8/03]

DICK CHENEY

Role In Going To War: Among a host of false pre-war statements, Cheney claimed that Iraq may have had a role in 9/11, stating that it was “pretty well confirmed” that 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligence officials. Cheney also claimed that Saddam was “in fact reconstituting his nuclear program” and that the U.S. would be “greeted as liberators.” [Meet the Press, 12/9/01, 3/16/03]

Where He Is Now: Cheney earned another four years in power when Bush won re-election in 2004. Despite some conservatives calling for him to be replaced, Cheney has said, “I’ve now been elected to a second term; I’ll serve out my term.” Cheney continues to advocate for preemptive military intervention, recently delivering threats toward Iran in a speech aboard an aircraft carrier off Iran’s coast. [CBS Face the Nation, 3/19/06; NYT, 5/11/07]

Key Quote: “I think they’re in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency.” [Larry King Live, 6/20/05]

GEORGE W. BUSH

Role In Going To War: Emphasizing Saddam Hussein’s supposed stockpile of weapons of mass destruction, supposed ties to al Qaeda, and supposed nuclear weapons program, Bush built public support for — and subsequently ordered — an invasion of Iraq. [State of the Union, 1/28/03]

Where He Is Now: In November 2004, Bush won re-election. Since that time, popular support for the war and the President have reached a low point — nearing the levels of Richard Nixon during Watergate. [Chicago Sun-Times, 6/19/07]

Key Quote: “Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” [Bush, 10/7/02]

from

http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/

Saturday, October 6, 2007

Saudis Rethink Taboo on Women Behind the Wheel

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 27 — In a recent episode of Saudi Arabia’s most popular television show, broadcast during Ramadan this month, a Saudi man of the future is seen sitting in his house as his daughter pulls into the driveway, her children piled into the back of the car.

LBC International

On a Saudi TV series, a woman in disguise drives a cab.

“Where have you been?” the father asks.

“The kids were bored, so I took them to the movies,” she replies, matter-of-factly, as she gets out of the driver’s seat.

The scene may appear mundane, but in Saudi Arabia, where women are forbidden to drive — and, by the way, where there are no movie theaters, either — the skit portends something of a revolution. From a taboo about which there could be no open discussion, a woman’s right to drive is becoming a topic of growing and lively debate in Saudi Arabia.

Coming after other recent changes — women may now travel abroad without male accompaniment (though male permission is still required), seek divorce and own their own companies — the driving discussion is noteworthy. Whether it signals that women will actually be driving soon or merely talking about it openly remains to be seen.

“We are telling everyone this is coming, whether today or tomorrow,” said Abdallah al-Sadhan, producer, writer and host of “Tash Ma Tash” (“No Big Deal”), a variety comedy show that is broadcast during Ramadan and tackles controversial social issues in Saudi Arabia. Other episodes have also shown women driving in what Mr. Sadhan says is a deliberate message. “There will be a time we will accept it, so now is the time to get prepared for that.”

In another popular Saudi show, “Amsha Bint Amash” (“Amsha, Daughter of Amash”), a woman who loses her father is forced to move to the city, where she masquerades as a man to become a taxi driver.

Saudi newspapers have begun writing about the implications and acceptability of having women drive. The Saudi National Human Rights Association has begun researching the effect of women’s driving on families and Saudi society, activists said.

A group of Saudi women have led a petition drive asking the king to repeal the ban on driving by women, placing the issue at the heart of a discussion about modernity and Saudi Arabia’s place in the world. And the government, which was hostile toward the last such petition in 1990, now seems mildly receptive.

“You get the feeling that they are preparing the population for this issue,” said Wajeha al- Huwaider, 45, one of the organizers. “It is just like the decision to allow women education. They resisted it, but now it’s a reality.”

On Sunday, Ms. Huwaider and some 1,100 other women sent the petition to King Abdullah.

Some Saudi officials and religious men agree with the women that Islam does not forbid women to drive. In the past, Saudi women were able to move freely on camel and horseback, and Bedouin women in the desert openly drive pickup trucks far from the public eye.

Clerics and religious conservatives maintain that allowing women to drive would open Saudi society to untold corruption. Women alone in a car, they say, would be more open to abuse, to going wayward, and to getting into trouble if they had an accident or were stopped by the police. The net result would be an erosion of social mores, they say.

In 1990, a group of prominent Saudi women seized on the presence of Western news media covering the first Persian Gulf war, boarded cars and drove through a Riyadh boulevard. Several of the women were jailed briefly; many lost high positions in schools and universities, and others were forced to leave the country for some time.

This time, however, the women are being given wide latitude to make their case, Ms. Huwaider said. She believes that this is because the case is being made in pragmatic social and economic terms, not purely as a matter of women’s rights.

Because of the rising cost of living in Saudi Arabia, women have been entering the work force in large numbers. That in turn has given them new economic clout in the family and greater leverage.

Ebtihal Mubarak, another organizer of the petition drive, who is an editor at Arab News, an English-language daily newspaper, said the cost of a driver had begun to impinge on Saudi families. “Most middle-class people can’t afford drivers anymore,” she said.

Saudi women say the seeming momentum behind the issue is fueled in part by what they can now see and read about the freedoms of women abroad on satellite television and the Internet. They also feel they have become more sophisticated in dealing with the Saudi system.

“This is more organized and is a real campaign,” said Khalid Al-Dakhil, professor of political sociology at King Saud University in Riyadh. “They have been on the Net, sending out e-mails.”

Still, few expect any change to come soon. Ms. Huwaider said the group had so far received no reply from the palace to the petition. Even women’s rights advocates said lifting ban would mean much preparation and public education, for women and men.

“Fifty years ago, we rejected the mail and then we advanced,” said Mr. Sadhan, the television producer. “We refused radio, only to accept it, and then rejected TV, and only to accept that, too. We will accept women driving some day all the same, and the environment has to be prepared for it.”

Rasheed Abou-Alsamh contributed reporting from Jidda, Saudi Arabia.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/world/middleeast/28drive.html?ref=world

Car Bomb Near Beirut Kills Christian Lawmaker

Antoine Ghanem, a prominent Christian member of Parliament and backer of Lebanon’s prime minister, Fouad Siniora, died when a bomb in a parked car went off as he drove by in a Christian suburb of the capital. Six other people also died.

Published: September 20, 2007

BEIRUT, Lebanon Sept. 19 — A powerful car bomb in a Christian neighborhood just east of Beirut killed a Christian lawmaker from the governing coalition and six others Wednesday evening. It was the latest in a deadly string of bombings that have rocked Lebanon’s teetering political order as the country prepares to select a new president.

Skip to next paragraph
Joseph Barrak/AFP-Getty Images

Lebanese army soldiers at the scene of a car bomb in a Christian suburb of Beirut on Wednesday.

Toufic Chebib/Agence France Press - Getty Images

A bombing with political overtones rattled a suburb of Beirut and raised tensions as Parliament is set to meet.

Mohamed Azakir/Reuters

Antoine Ghanem had returned to Beirut just two days before he was killed.

The bombing appeared to have deep political implications, giving credence to longstanding fears of a plot to eliminate the governing March 14 movement’s razor-thin majority in Parliament.

The bomb, apparently hidden inside a parked car in the Sin el Fil neighborhood, exploded just as the lawmaker, Antoine Ghanem of the Christian Phalange Party, drove past. The explosion ripped through the busy street, crushing cars and damaging buildings nearby, in a scene now eerily familiar in this politically tense city.

Mr. Ghanem, 64, and his bodyguard died instantly, security officials said, and five passers-by were also killed. At least 19 others were wounded, medical workers and security officials said.

“It went dark, then a blinding light followed,” said Toufic Shabib, who owns a flower shop near the bombing site. “I ran outside. Everything was burning — cars, people. It was like a war zone.”

The blast raised concerns that Lebanon’s political turmoil might be taking a turn for the worse as Parliament prepares to meet next week for the first time in almost a year. The legislators plan to take up one of the most significant tests in this severely divided country: to deliberate over the choice of a new president to replace Émile Lahoud, who must step down on Nov. 25.

Lebanon has been locked in a 10-month political stalemate between the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and the Hezbollah-led opposition, backed by Iran and Syria. The opposition, in part trading on Hezbollah’s popularity after its war with Israel a year ago, has been demanding a greater role in government.

Lebanon has faced one security threat after another, with seven car bombings in the capital this summer while the army battled Al Qaeda-inspired militants in a Palestinian refugee camp in northern Lebanon.

In Washington, the White House condemned the attack and strongly suggested that Syria was behind it, though the press secretary, Dana M. Perino, stopped short of directly accusing Syria. “There has been a pattern of political assassinations and attempted assassinations designed to intimidate those working courageously toward a sovereign and democratic Lebanon,” Ms. Perino said. “The victims of these cowardly attacks have consistently been those who publicly sought to end Syria’s interference in Lebanon’s internal affairs.”

It was not immediately clear how the assassination would affect the political process or the March 14 movement’s narrowing majority in Parliament.

Some analysts said the assassination might be part of a plot to eliminate the governing coalition’s majority by assassination.

Mr. Ghanem was the fourth anti-Syrian lawmaker and the eighth leader assassinated since a huge blast killed former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, setting off a cycle of political crises. A number of lawmakers, apparently nervous about the situation, have been outside of the country in recent weeks. Mr. Ghanem had been away and had returned only two days before.

With Mr. Ghanem’s death, March 14 will control 67 out of the 128 seats in Parliament; to elect a president outright, it must have a majority of 65. “What is clear is that there is someone working on depriving the majority of its majority,” said Ziad Baroud, an independent Lebanese lawyer. It was unlikely that an election to replace Mr. Ghanem could be held before next week’s expected parliamentary session. “These assassinations are connected to the presidential election,” he said.

Last November, Pierre Gemayel, a Parliament member with the March 14 movement, was assassinated by gunmen on a busy street; in June, Walid Eido, a Sunni Muslim member and an outspoken critic of Syria, died in a bombing. March 14 members blame Syria for the killings.

In a significant blow last month, an opposition candidate, Kamil Khoury, defeated a former president, Amin Gemayel, the father of Pierre, in a pivotal election to fill his son’s vacant seat.

Mr. Khoury is allied with a Christian rival of the governing coalition, Michel Aoun, a former general who has, in turn, made common cause with the opposition Shiite Muslim Hezbollah Party and led a single-minded quest to become president.

In Damascus, a statement by a “media source,” quoted by the official news agency, SANA, condemned the assassination on Wednesday as an act that “targets the efforts and endeavors exerted by Syria and others to achieve the Lebanese national accord.”

Mahdi Dakhalallah, Syria’s former information minister, said in a telephone interview, “This could be destabilizing for Lebanon, Syria and the whole region.” He added, “I hope this event will be more reason for Lebanese to go and vote to elect a new president for national unity.”

Nada Bakri reported from Beirut, and Hassan M. Fattah from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Hugh Naylor contributed reporting from Damascus, Syria, and Steven Lee Myers from Washington.

from

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/world/middleeast/20lebanon.html?ref=world


Nasrallah urges Arab states not to attend US-sponsored Middle East peace conference

Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday called the US-sponsored international Middle East peace conference as a part of US-Israeli plot. Speaking on the occasion of international Quds Day in Beirut, Nasrallah warned Arab nations especially Saudi Arabia not to take part in the conference.

"It's for the Israeli regime to receive normalization with the Arab countries that do not recognize the entity right now and on the other hand it will have nothing for the Palestinians" he said. "Why should we offer this great benefit to the weak cabinet of Ehud Olmert?" he asked.

Nassrallah stressed that the Israeli cabinet must be indicted for the 2006's July War in an international court.

According to the Shiite leader, Israel's goals in Lebanon included having Hizbullah dragged into internal conflicts, "so as to distract us from our true goal and to weaken our performance." "But Israel should know we will never take any Lebanese group as our enemy," he said.

Regarding the Israeli attack on Syria last month he said "these measures seem to be a psychological war or a preliminary to launch an aggression."

He also called for a unified Arab stance concerning the situation in Palestine. "We are not urging Arab leaders to prepare for a large-scale war against Israel because this will not happen," he said. We only call on Arab countries to support Palestinians both politically and financially and they, in turn, will know how to handle their own problems very well."

© 2007 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)

http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Lebanon/217427

Haniyeh Urges Arab Leaders to Boycott Conference

GAZA CITY/RAMALLAH, 7 October 2007 — Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the Hamas government in Gaza, yesterday urged Arab leaders not to attend the US-hosted international peace conference in the fall.

In an interview with the Falasteen newspaper, Haniyeh said: “We are going to appeal directly to Arab brothers, mainly the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to reconsider any decision to participate in this conference.”

Haniyeh said he did not expect any concrete result from the conference as Israel had stuck to its stance on Jerusalem, the return of refugees and the 1967 borders.

“The Palestinians did not build much hope on the previous Oslo agreements,” Haniyeh said in the interview with the pro-Hamas daily, referring to the interim peace accords reached in the mid-1990s. “Therefore, we are not going to build any hope on the results of this conference,” he said.

Hamas issued a similar appeal late last month. Hamas has tried to stay on good terms with the Arab world.

The United States has not yet set a date for the conference or announced a list of participants. Both depend, in part, on how much progress Israeli and Palestinian teams will make in drafting a joint declaration of principles that would guide future talks on a final peace deal. The conference is to endorse such a document, and possibly relaunch peace talks that broke down in January 2001.

The head of the Palestinian negotiating team, Ahmed Qorei, said yesterday that if a joint Israeli-Palestinian statement was not formulated before the conference, the Palestinians might not participate in it.

He added that both teams would hold their first meeting tomorrow to draft a joint statement ahead of the conference.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minster Ehud Olmert, during their meeting on Wednesday in Jerusalem, gave a green light to the negotiating teams to start working on the joint statement.

Qorei, who is a member of Fatah’s Central Committee and a former Palestinian Authority prime minister, told Palestinian media that the two sides should agree before the summit, which Israeli officials say is set for Nov. 26, on a timetable for implementing agreements.

He also said that the principles of a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are clear to both sides, and now they simply must be worded into a serious, unambiguous document.

Qorei said that the internal Palestinian stalemate between his movement and Hamas “can no longer be allowed to prevent the resolution of the Palestinian issue.”

He warned that there was no room for confusion regarding the key issues of an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. “It is vital that in the next few days we reach agreements on these issues, which include Jerusalem, refugees, borders, water, settlements and prisoners.”

According to Israeli political sources, the statement may include references to the core issues of a final-status agreement on the establishment of a Palestinian state, but such references would be noncommittal, and the statement will deal only with issues that enjoy clear agreement.

The parties differ greatly on the results they would like the conference to yield, with Abbas looking for agreement on core issues while Olmert seeks a vague statement of interests.

Israeli officials said the statement would be “significant enough but general enough to avoid a blow-up or crisis.”

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is to arrive in Israel and the Palestinian territories next week to see if a joint statement can include the core issues.

from

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4&section=0&article=102138&d=7&m=10&y=2007

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Arab American National Museum Seeks to Dispel Stereotypes



03 October 2007

There are scores of museums in the United States, to educate the public about specific ethnic groups, but not until two years ago was there one devoted to Arab Americans. That is when the Arab American National Museum opened in Dearborn, Michigan, near Detroit. VOA's Mohamed Elshinnawi recently toured the museum and has this report.

The Arab American National Museum is in the heart of Dearborn, Michigan
The Arab American National Museum is in the heart of Dearborn, Michigan
The Arab American National Museum sits across the street from Dearborn City Hall, indicative of how Arab Americans are an integral part of American society.

Museum Director Anan Ameri told us, "When people come and visit the exhibits, they say, if they are Latin Americans or Italian Americans: 'Oh, this is like my father's story, my grandmother's story.' And in the bottom end of it, the Arab American story is really the American story, the story of immigrants coming to this country from all parts of the world to create better lives for themselves and for their children."

Anan Ameri
Anan Ameri
Muslim civilizations in medicine, architecture, science and music. Visitors then are introduced to the Arab world today before they start their tour of exhibits that tell the Arab American story.

Celine Taminian is the director of educational programs. "On the second floor we have three major exhibits or galleries: Coming to America, Living in America and Making an Impact,” she says. "Through these exhibits we teach students who live in America about the Arab culture and Arab Americans who live here in the U.S., about their lifestyle, about the work they do, how they came to the U.S. and what their impact is on this culture and on this country."

Celine Taminian
Celine Taminian
She says the most fascinating exhibit for most visitors is "Making an Impact." She says they are amazed by how many faces they know -- in politics, former Senator George Mitchell and former Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham; in science, Nobel Prize winner Ahmed Zowail; in sports, former football star Doug Flutie; and in entertainment, actors Kathy Najimy and Tony Shalhoub. Museum visitors often find it an eye-opener on Arab culture and Arab Americans.

Barbara Aswad is a professor of anthropology at University of California. "Americans absolutely do not know enough about Arabs, and certainly about Arab Americans. They do not know their history, and I hope eventually they will get more history in this museum."

The museum has numerous displays of the contributions of Arab Americans in the arts, sciences, and other aspects of society
The museum has numerous displays of the contributions of Arab Americans in the arts, sciences, and other aspects of society
And one young visitor finds something else. "I think it is nice because it has all these details you know, stuff about Muslims and all that."

Ralph Valdez is the museum's director of cultural programs. He says the museum organizes a multi-cultural music series to demonstrate the common ground that different cultures share. "They can see in the art, similarities of themes of love, family and devotion and very many things that people of all nationalities and ethnicities celebrate in their art,” he said. “They see the commonalities and that helps them to open their understanding and get away from the stereotypes."

Since its opening two years ago, more than 80,000 people have visited the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn, and it has become a well known resource for documented information about Arabs and Arab Americans .

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-10-03-voa55.cfm

Iran Instead of America…Samarra Instead of Baghdad

Dhia al-Hashimi - translated by AMSI Press Department.

Wednesday, 03 October 2007

Within the tension in the Arabian Gulf prior to the failure of the US occupation to reach its aims starting from Iraq and having a big casualties and lose in equipments caused by heroes of the Iraqi resistance. It seems that the American Administration started to work on the plan "B" in the region.

America thinks that by this alternative plan it could reach to its aim… The mean pivot in this plan is Iran…It is more preferable to US to support big role to the Iranian regime in order to perform things which America couldn’t do along the passed four years.

US and Iran are considered the same face of a currency... "Islamic Republic" didn’t have any difficulties to declare in many occasions that the US forces could not occupy Iraq or Afghanistan in the absence of Iran.

This words are 100% true... Because the Iranian regime is considered as the policeman of the region to protect the American and Israeli benefits, Iran is also the stick of American Administration to intimidate the Arab leaders in the region in order to keep them away to turn over against the exhausted "Lord of the world"!!!.

A stage of American plan is threatening the Arab countries in particular the Gulf by the Persian extension in the region to be capable to destroy any state … as Hussein Shariatmadari who is the head editor of "Kayhan" newspapers says: "the Iranian is despising the latest American "cartoon" to Tehran." He expresses that in case of war to be started it will not remain in Iran only, many Arab regimes will fell down. In particular Iran has an old cupidity in the region trying to realize it even on account of her nuclear program. This assures the truthful of our words that America will go on to the Plan "B" through pushing Iran to occupy the region after the comedy American attacks to the territory of Iran !! Yes, if USA attacks to Iran, the reason will be to set the rage fire among the Shiites in the Gulf States. It is only an awful mission without thinking negative results of it. The strikes will be artificial on Iran and it will not damage her as it had done in Iraq.

Prior to the American strike an Kurdish – Arab armed conflict will be set out for the City of Kirkuk, which will be turned to war that Iran and Turkey will participated in. The aim is not controlling Kirkuk City as somebody thinks; but it is a part of the plan that we are talking about. The recent declaration of Ammar Al-Hakim about their objection to divide Iraq is only a mediatic disinformation and "avoidance". They only want to keep out of the responsibilities that will borne upon the condition of Iraq after the Arabs and Kurds conflict.

Because the world is following the Iraqi event and what will be prepared behind the backstage will easily be seen such as cooking the new "food" for Iraq... Before a couple of days a new map of Iraq were discovered in the map. Iraq is divided into three regions, and they are not the places of everyday talk. It is a different Iraq than we used to… The map shows a Kurdish independent state situated in the North and northeast of Iraq… i.e the places were where they had controlled while the occupation was and which is called "the securitized place". The map also shows that the City of Kirkuk will remain out of Kurdish control... The remainder of the Iraqi territory – mid, South and northwest – will turned to be called Iraqi Federation between Shiites and Sunni’s. Baghdad will be the midpoint neither Shiites nor Sunnis; it is neutral. The capital city will be Samarra instead of Baghdad according to the plan… The current government will agree for the requests of "reconciliation front" as the Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki used to call, because it doesn’t represent all Sunnis.

With these new dangerous plans there are no other choices in front of the Arab countries unless otherwise working hard to oppose these plans through unification, strengthen and spending all materially and spiritually possibilities to support the Iraqi resistance. Because the resistance is the only foundation that has stood in front of both the American and the Iranian occupations. We believe in Allah (swt) that He will assist us, He is the conqueror; however we should plan our path according to the effects of the enemy plans. The resistance is resistance so the Arabs must be aware… Otherwise everything will go up side down.

Written by Dhia al-Hashimi and translated by AMSI Press Department. © 2007
http://uruknet.info/?p=m36882&s1=h1

Monday, October 1, 2007

Laughs, lectures and reflection--It's Ramadan TV

By Andrew Hammond

RIYADH, Oct 1 (Reuters Life!) - If you're seeing women drivers in a futuristic Riyadh, laughing at the antics of Saudi bumpkins abroad or being reprimanded for using English slang in Arabic then you must be watching Ramadan TV in Saudi Arabia.

The holy month, when Muslims around the world fast from dawn to dusk, has traditionally provided the media with the chance to mix hilarity with serious debate on a host of social issues for Saudis glued to the television during their evening feast.

With "reform" now a buzzword in the conservative kingdom since King Abdullah ascended the throne in 2005, efforts to "better" the Saudi citizen through pithy commentaries in comedy, drama and direct lecturing have notably increased.

Saudi-owned, Dubai-based pan-Arab entertainment network MBC is the main vehicle for Saudi Ramadan television.

Self-styled preacher-in-jeans Ahmed al-Sheqeiri kicks off the evening around 6 o'clock local time (1500 GMT) with his 10-minute "Thoughts of a Youth" show, in which topics range from attacks on the trend for mixing English with spoken Arabic to pressing for Islamic technology advances to catch up the West.

"We have to admit that today English is the language of knowledge, but that doesn't mean we should forget our own mother tongue," he said recently.

In another episode, he exhorts viewers to help the Islamic world to equal or outdo the West in industrial, technological and other creative output by 2030, while praising the Proton car made in fellow Islamic country Malaysia and ruefully noting that the equipment used to film his show was made in Japan. "I hope Islamic countries can start the project for the Islamic camera!" he said.

SOCIAL REFORM

A number of shows have tried to lend a helping hand to a campaign to overturn the kingdom's informal ban on women driving. Cartoon series "Mizna and Family" showed women driving in a Riyadh-of-the-future replete with space-age skyscrapers.

The most-watched Saudi show in Ramadan, the comedy "Tash ma Tash" has provoked controversy for lampooning Islamists and liberal intellectuals. The show's popularity has not been dented by the issue of several fatwas banning viewers from watching it.

One recent episode depicted members of the conservative Islamic country's liberals as boozy bourgeois chatterboxes out of touch with reality as they discuss Marx and Engels over bottles of alcohol and heaping dishes of Arab food. As they chat, the music of the secular intellectual's chanteuse of choice, Lebanese diva Fairouz plays in the background.

But liberals were also shown as being easily susceptible to state influence.

"Tash has become a Ramadan staple. It's on the table with the food, but every year they raise the ceiling of criticism," al-Hayat newspaper commentator Saud al-Rais said of the show.

In another comedy, "Bayni wa Baynak" (Between Me and You), two country bumpkins turn the stereotype of affluent Saudis swanning around the Arab world completely on its head when they pitch up in Egypt and become so tangled up in dialect that they end up spluttering gibberish at each other.

Actor Fayez al-Maliki's character Manahi, has become a familiar figure of fun for Saudis watching huge plasma screens put up for Ramadan buffets.

Odwan al-Ahmari, who writes about Ramadan TV in al-Watan newspaper, said the social critique "Bayni wa Baynak" was far more subtle than "Tash".

In one episode, Manahi completely ignores Islamic mores and gets drunk on a plane heading to Saudi Arabia from Egypt, but then inadvertently finds himself in the role of a hypocritical zealot yelling at Egyptian women to "cover up".

"Maliki is like Mr Bean. Now people are waiting every year to see what show Manahi will be on," he said.

© Reuters 2007. All Rights Reserved

Friday, September 28, 2007

Saudi Asks Israel to Abandon Barrier as a Gesture to Arabs

Published: September 27, 2007

Israel should stop work on a security barrier in and along the West Bank and halt settlement activity there as a good-will gesture to assure Arab states that it is serious about comprehensive peace talks, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister said yesterday.

The minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, stopped short of making his demand a condition for Arab attendance at a planned Middle East peace conference. And he said that in recent days, he had become encouraged about the prospects for the conference, which the United States is to sponsor in November. But he would not promise that Saudi Arabia would attend, a major Israeli objective.

His comments, after a meeting between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and top officials from the gulf Arab states on the outskirts of the United Nations General Assembly here, forecast the tough road ahead for the Bush administration in trying to forge a comprehensive Middle East peace in the last months of President Bush’s term.

Saudi Arabia and America’s other Arab allies have insisted that the conference tackle the so-called final status issues that have bedeviled negotiators since 1979. They include the status of Jerusalem, the fate of Palestinian refugees who fled their homes or were forced out, the dismantling of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, and the borders of an eventual Palestinian state.

Bush administration officials say that they are also pushing Israel hard to put the big issues on the table, but acknowledge that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel needs something in return: Arab, and especially Saudi, diplomatic recognition of Israel.

During a briefing for reporters yesterday, Prince Saud raised another potentially sticky issue for the Bush administration as it seeks progress on a peace proposal: the Islamic group Hamas, which the United States and Israel view as a terrorist organization but which controls Gaza, home to 1.4 million Palestinians.

After Hamas’s violent takeover of Gaza, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, kicked Hamas out of the national unity government that Hamas formed in February with Mr. Abbas’s Fatah party. The ejection was applauded by the United States and Israel, which have refused to deal with Hamas.

But Prince Saud said that for any peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians to work, Hamas must be brought into another national unity government with Fatah. He said that if the international community had accepted the Palestinian national unity government in February, when Saudi Arabia brokered an accord establishing the government, Hamas might have eventually renounced violence against Israel. He called that “water under the bridge now,” but added that Saudi Arabia still wanted to establish another national unity government between Hamas and Fatah.

“You have to,” he said. “Peace can not be made by one man or by half a people.”

But compromise on Hamas is not likely from the Bush administration, which has characterized the battle against the group as a fight between moderates and extremists.

The Middle East peace conference has dominated the behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing in meetings on the outskirts of the General Assembly. President Bush, by publicly announcing the peace conference two months ago, gave high-level attention to an issue that critics said his administration had ignored for six years.

But now, some analysts say, that attention has raised expectations, putting the administration in the position of having to produce something tangible.

“Failure is not an option,” Ms. Rice told Arab officials at a meeting this week, quoting a line from “Apollo 13,” one of her favorite movies.

Prince Saud repeated that line at his briefing with reporters. He also said that the conference would be pointless if Syria did not attend. Ms. Rice said earlier that the United States planned to invite Syria.

“You know the old saying,” Prince Saud joked, “that there can be no war without Egypt and no peace without Syria.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/world/middleeast/27diplo.html?ref=world