Saturday, October 6, 2007

Bin Laden, on Tape, Urges Pakistanis to Oust Musharraf

Published: September 21, 2007

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 20 — In a recording released Thursday, Osama bin Laden urged Muslims in Pakistan to rise up against Gen. Pervez Musharraf, the president, whom he called an apostate for deciding to storm the Red Mosque in Islamabad to evict Islamist militants.

The mosque attack in July “demonstrated Musharraf’s insistence on continuing his loyalty, submissiveness and aid to America against the Muslims,” said Mr. bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda. He said it had made “removing him an obligation.”

The recording, an audio track accompanied by previously released videotape, was the third attributed to Mr. bin Laden in the last month. It was released on Web sites frequented by militants just weeks before presidential elections in Pakistan.

Al Qaeda has released video and audio recordings for the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. It released a documentary on Thursday in which Mr. Zawahri said America was losing in Afghanistan and Iraq.

from

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/21/world/asia/21qaeda.html

Saudis Rethink Taboo on Women Behind the Wheel

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 27 — In a recent episode of Saudi Arabia’s most popular television show, broadcast during Ramadan this month, a Saudi man of the future is seen sitting in his house as his daughter pulls into the driveway, her children piled into the back of the car.

LBC International

On a Saudi TV series, a woman in disguise drives a cab.

“Where have you been?” the father asks.

“The kids were bored, so I took them to the movies,” she replies, matter-of-factly, as she gets out of the driver’s seat.

The scene may appear mundane, but in Saudi Arabia, where women are forbidden to drive — and, by the way, where there are no movie theaters, either — the skit portends something of a revolution. From a taboo about which there could be no open discussion, a woman’s right to drive is becoming a topic of growing and lively debate in Saudi Arabia.

Coming after other recent changes — women may now travel abroad without male accompaniment (though male permission is still required), seek divorce and own their own companies — the driving discussion is noteworthy. Whether it signals that women will actually be driving soon or merely talking about it openly remains to be seen.

“We are telling everyone this is coming, whether today or tomorrow,” said Abdallah al-Sadhan, producer, writer and host of “Tash Ma Tash” (“No Big Deal”), a variety comedy show that is broadcast during Ramadan and tackles controversial social issues in Saudi Arabia. Other episodes have also shown women driving in what Mr. Sadhan says is a deliberate message. “There will be a time we will accept it, so now is the time to get prepared for that.”

In another popular Saudi show, “Amsha Bint Amash” (“Amsha, Daughter of Amash”), a woman who loses her father is forced to move to the city, where she masquerades as a man to become a taxi driver.

Saudi newspapers have begun writing about the implications and acceptability of having women drive. The Saudi National Human Rights Association has begun researching the effect of women’s driving on families and Saudi society, activists said.

A group of Saudi women have led a petition drive asking the king to repeal the ban on driving by women, placing the issue at the heart of a discussion about modernity and Saudi Arabia’s place in the world. And the government, which was hostile toward the last such petition in 1990, now seems mildly receptive.

“You get the feeling that they are preparing the population for this issue,” said Wajeha al- Huwaider, 45, one of the organizers. “It is just like the decision to allow women education. They resisted it, but now it’s a reality.”

On Sunday, Ms. Huwaider and some 1,100 other women sent the petition to King Abdullah.

Some Saudi officials and religious men agree with the women that Islam does not forbid women to drive. In the past, Saudi women were able to move freely on camel and horseback, and Bedouin women in the desert openly drive pickup trucks far from the public eye.

Clerics and religious conservatives maintain that allowing women to drive would open Saudi society to untold corruption. Women alone in a car, they say, would be more open to abuse, to going wayward, and to getting into trouble if they had an accident or were stopped by the police. The net result would be an erosion of social mores, they say.

In 1990, a group of prominent Saudi women seized on the presence of Western news media covering the first Persian Gulf war, boarded cars and drove through a Riyadh boulevard. Several of the women were jailed briefly; many lost high positions in schools and universities, and others were forced to leave the country for some time.

This time, however, the women are being given wide latitude to make their case, Ms. Huwaider said. She believes that this is because the case is being made in pragmatic social and economic terms, not purely as a matter of women’s rights.

Because of the rising cost of living in Saudi Arabia, women have been entering the work force in large numbers. That in turn has given them new economic clout in the family and greater leverage.

Ebtihal Mubarak, another organizer of the petition drive, who is an editor at Arab News, an English-language daily newspaper, said the cost of a driver had begun to impinge on Saudi families. “Most middle-class people can’t afford drivers anymore,” she said.

Saudi women say the seeming momentum behind the issue is fueled in part by what they can now see and read about the freedoms of women abroad on satellite television and the Internet. They also feel they have become more sophisticated in dealing with the Saudi system.

“This is more organized and is a real campaign,” said Khalid Al-Dakhil, professor of political sociology at King Saud University in Riyadh. “They have been on the Net, sending out e-mails.”

Still, few expect any change to come soon. Ms. Huwaider said the group had so far received no reply from the palace to the petition. Even women’s rights advocates said lifting ban would mean much preparation and public education, for women and men.

“Fifty years ago, we rejected the mail and then we advanced,” said Mr. Sadhan, the television producer. “We refused radio, only to accept it, and then rejected TV, and only to accept that, too. We will accept women driving some day all the same, and the environment has to be prepared for it.”

Rasheed Abou-Alsamh contributed reporting from Jidda, Saudi Arabia.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/world/middleeast/28drive.html?ref=world

Car Bomb Near Beirut Kills Christian Lawmaker

Antoine Ghanem, a prominent Christian member of Parliament and backer of Lebanon’s prime minister, Fouad Siniora, died when a bomb in a parked car went off as he drove by in a Christian suburb of the capital. Six other people also died.

Published: September 20, 2007

BEIRUT, Lebanon Sept. 19 — A powerful car bomb in a Christian neighborhood just east of Beirut killed a Christian lawmaker from the governing coalition and six others Wednesday evening. It was the latest in a deadly string of bombings that have rocked Lebanon’s teetering political order as the country prepares to select a new president.

Skip to next paragraph
Joseph Barrak/AFP-Getty Images

Lebanese army soldiers at the scene of a car bomb in a Christian suburb of Beirut on Wednesday.

Toufic Chebib/Agence France Press - Getty Images

A bombing with political overtones rattled a suburb of Beirut and raised tensions as Parliament is set to meet.

Mohamed Azakir/Reuters

Antoine Ghanem had returned to Beirut just two days before he was killed.

The bombing appeared to have deep political implications, giving credence to longstanding fears of a plot to eliminate the governing March 14 movement’s razor-thin majority in Parliament.

The bomb, apparently hidden inside a parked car in the Sin el Fil neighborhood, exploded just as the lawmaker, Antoine Ghanem of the Christian Phalange Party, drove past. The explosion ripped through the busy street, crushing cars and damaging buildings nearby, in a scene now eerily familiar in this politically tense city.

Mr. Ghanem, 64, and his bodyguard died instantly, security officials said, and five passers-by were also killed. At least 19 others were wounded, medical workers and security officials said.

“It went dark, then a blinding light followed,” said Toufic Shabib, who owns a flower shop near the bombing site. “I ran outside. Everything was burning — cars, people. It was like a war zone.”

The blast raised concerns that Lebanon’s political turmoil might be taking a turn for the worse as Parliament prepares to meet next week for the first time in almost a year. The legislators plan to take up one of the most significant tests in this severely divided country: to deliberate over the choice of a new president to replace Émile Lahoud, who must step down on Nov. 25.

Lebanon has been locked in a 10-month political stalemate between the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and the Hezbollah-led opposition, backed by Iran and Syria. The opposition, in part trading on Hezbollah’s popularity after its war with Israel a year ago, has been demanding a greater role in government.

Lebanon has faced one security threat after another, with seven car bombings in the capital this summer while the army battled Al Qaeda-inspired militants in a Palestinian refugee camp in northern Lebanon.

In Washington, the White House condemned the attack and strongly suggested that Syria was behind it, though the press secretary, Dana M. Perino, stopped short of directly accusing Syria. “There has been a pattern of political assassinations and attempted assassinations designed to intimidate those working courageously toward a sovereign and democratic Lebanon,” Ms. Perino said. “The victims of these cowardly attacks have consistently been those who publicly sought to end Syria’s interference in Lebanon’s internal affairs.”

It was not immediately clear how the assassination would affect the political process or the March 14 movement’s narrowing majority in Parliament.

Some analysts said the assassination might be part of a plot to eliminate the governing coalition’s majority by assassination.

Mr. Ghanem was the fourth anti-Syrian lawmaker and the eighth leader assassinated since a huge blast killed former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, setting off a cycle of political crises. A number of lawmakers, apparently nervous about the situation, have been outside of the country in recent weeks. Mr. Ghanem had been away and had returned only two days before.

With Mr. Ghanem’s death, March 14 will control 67 out of the 128 seats in Parliament; to elect a president outright, it must have a majority of 65. “What is clear is that there is someone working on depriving the majority of its majority,” said Ziad Baroud, an independent Lebanese lawyer. It was unlikely that an election to replace Mr. Ghanem could be held before next week’s expected parliamentary session. “These assassinations are connected to the presidential election,” he said.

Last November, Pierre Gemayel, a Parliament member with the March 14 movement, was assassinated by gunmen on a busy street; in June, Walid Eido, a Sunni Muslim member and an outspoken critic of Syria, died in a bombing. March 14 members blame Syria for the killings.

In a significant blow last month, an opposition candidate, Kamil Khoury, defeated a former president, Amin Gemayel, the father of Pierre, in a pivotal election to fill his son’s vacant seat.

Mr. Khoury is allied with a Christian rival of the governing coalition, Michel Aoun, a former general who has, in turn, made common cause with the opposition Shiite Muslim Hezbollah Party and led a single-minded quest to become president.

In Damascus, a statement by a “media source,” quoted by the official news agency, SANA, condemned the assassination on Wednesday as an act that “targets the efforts and endeavors exerted by Syria and others to achieve the Lebanese national accord.”

Mahdi Dakhalallah, Syria’s former information minister, said in a telephone interview, “This could be destabilizing for Lebanon, Syria and the whole region.” He added, “I hope this event will be more reason for Lebanese to go and vote to elect a new president for national unity.”

Nada Bakri reported from Beirut, and Hassan M. Fattah from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Hugh Naylor contributed reporting from Damascus, Syria, and Steven Lee Myers from Washington.

from

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/world/middleeast/20lebanon.html?ref=world


Nasrallah urges Arab states not to attend US-sponsored Middle East peace conference

Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday called the US-sponsored international Middle East peace conference as a part of US-Israeli plot. Speaking on the occasion of international Quds Day in Beirut, Nasrallah warned Arab nations especially Saudi Arabia not to take part in the conference.

"It's for the Israeli regime to receive normalization with the Arab countries that do not recognize the entity right now and on the other hand it will have nothing for the Palestinians" he said. "Why should we offer this great benefit to the weak cabinet of Ehud Olmert?" he asked.

Nassrallah stressed that the Israeli cabinet must be indicted for the 2006's July War in an international court.

According to the Shiite leader, Israel's goals in Lebanon included having Hizbullah dragged into internal conflicts, "so as to distract us from our true goal and to weaken our performance." "But Israel should know we will never take any Lebanese group as our enemy," he said.

Regarding the Israeli attack on Syria last month he said "these measures seem to be a psychological war or a preliminary to launch an aggression."

He also called for a unified Arab stance concerning the situation in Palestine. "We are not urging Arab leaders to prepare for a large-scale war against Israel because this will not happen," he said. We only call on Arab countries to support Palestinians both politically and financially and they, in turn, will know how to handle their own problems very well."

© 2007 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)

http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Lebanon/217427

Boro refuses to tackle Islamophobia

By Elham Asaad Buaras

When The Muslim News probed Middlesbrough FC on its handling of the incident in which Mido, their Egyptian forward, was subjected to Islamophobic chants, the club merely said having a multinational team will be their “strongest anti-racism message”.
Mido, whose real name is Ahmed Hossam Hussein Abdelhamid, was subjected to 90 minutes of “terrorist” and “Mido, he’s got a bomb” chants by Newcastle fans in the 2-2 draw at the Riverside Stadium on August 26.
Having scored the first of Middlesbrough’s two goals, Mido celebrated in front of the Newcastle fans by holding his index finger to his lips. Adding insult to injury, the referee decided to book him. Speaking after the match, Middlesbrough Manager, Gareth Southgate, fumed, “Its okay for 3,000 to abuse one person. But when the boot is on the other foot, he gets punished.”
Yet Middlesbrough have refused to disclose a report to the Football Association (FA) or exchange intelligence with Cleveland police. They have not inspected CCTV or TV footage around the stadium. They will not even browse online Youtube videos recording some of the taunts.
Writing in the Match Programme for the home match against Wigan Athletic, Newcastle’s Chairman, Chris Mort, called for all parties to “work hard together to make sure the Mido incident is a one-off.”
Preposterously glossing over the fact that Mido faced similar abuse from Southampton and West Ham fans two years ago playing for Tottenham Hotspurs, the 24- year-old’s new club have decided not to take any action, “We trust and believe that the incident involving some Newcastle United supporters was a one-off and sincerely hope that it will not be repeated again in the future by fans of any club.”
Yet denial and complacency over Islamophobia in English football is not exclusive to clubs. Football’s anti-racism body Kick It Out told The Muslim News it received numerous complaints about the manner in which sections of the media have addressed the matter. “In discussing the abuse received by Mido, one of the presenters (on a national sports radio station) has been classifying it as a bit of fun” read one complaint.
Some of the discussions have gone as far as to suggest the abuse was not Islamophobic. “Obviously, it was not claiming that all Muslims are terrorists. It’s just a chant,” said one fan. Some of the views expressed on a Newcastle fans message board were defiant. Ian Cusack, of the fanzine Players Inc said, “The Mido chants were very unsavoury but I don’t think they were racist, Newcastle have Muslim players, Emre is a Muslim. They were just a way of winding the opposition up but they didn’t work as Mido scored. The chants should be placed in the context of local rivalry.”
Kick It Out said they are adamant the chanting was Islamophobic. Kick It Out spokesman said they were “disappointed by Cleveland Police for not taking any action”, putting the onus on the clubs to find witnesses and make complaints.
Declining to comment on why no arrests were made on the day despite having officers scattered around the grounds, Cleveland police spokesperson told The Muslim News Middlesbrough had not made an official complaint but confirmed five arrests not related to the chanting were made on the day. They would, however, cooperate with the FA investigation.
On its part the FA, which wrote to the two clubs to ask for their observations, told The Muslim News it is “taking the matter very seriously” but said it would not be able to carry out an adequate investigation without the co-operation of the clubs. “We want to root out those fans. Nobody wants to go to a football match with those kinds of fans. We need court-orders to ban those fans from football grounds around the country, but we need witnesses and assistance to achieve that.”
In a statement to The Muslim News, the Commission for Racial Equality condemned the “completely unacceptable” incident, insisting, “There should be no place for racists and Islamophobes.” Yet, like the FA, the soon to be defunct CRE washed its hands of the incident. A spokesperson for the Commission said it was not “in the position” to call for action from the FA or the police.

from
http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=3142

UK Muslims launch campaign to counter Islamophobia

UK Muslim Campaign-Islamophobia
An advertising campaign was launched by British Muslims Monday to counter an new surge in Islamophobic attacks following attempting car bombings in London and at Glasgow airport in July.

"In the current atmosphere of suspicion and fear about Islam and British Muslims, truth is often confused with fabrications and stereotypes," said Ifhat Shaheen-Smith, one of the organizers of the 'Islam is Peace campaign'.

"Prejudice has become entrenched and sensationalistic media reporting is creating a climate of paranoia. There is a desperate need for openness, mutual understanding and a mature debate," Shaheen-Smith said.

The advertising campaign on buses and trains, which is to be followed by a nationwide tour, is the second since Islam is Peace was formed in the aftermath of the 2005 bombings in London.

Muslim Labour MP Sadiq Khan welcomed the move as a "fantastic initiative," saying that "Islam is a faith whose primary focus is peace and submission to one God."
"This campaign will help to bust some of the myths about Islam and allow the true face of Islam to reach all parts of our country," said Khan, who is also a human rights lawyer.

Secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain Mohammed Abdul Bari said the move showed that "the silent majority of Muslims are coming forward and now challenging Islamophobia in sections of our media." He said it was a "brave undertaking."

from
http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0710011493150652.htm

Fighting terror should not be Islamophobia: Uzbek FM

United Nations, Oct 03: Uzbek Foreign Minister Vladimir Norov has called on the members of the United Nations (UN) to prevent the fight against terrorism from turning into Islamophobia.

"We are coming out most resolutely against the transformation of this fight into Islamophobia and into overt or covert confrontation with the Islamic world," he stated in the course of the Tuesday general political discussion at the 62nd session of the UN General Assembly.

Touching on the problem of regional security, the Uzbek minister noted that "the currently shaping up situation in central Asia is intertwined by many contradictory processes is an intertwined knot of numerous contradictory processes, which are apt to negatively affect the cause of security" not only in this region, but far beyond its bounds, too.

In connection with this, Norov urged the international community to exert every effort to stabilise the situation in Afghanistan. This problem should be resolved by demilitarising the country and tackling its most acute socio-economic problems, the minister noted.

He also went on record for measures to "stem the narcotics aggression, emanating from that country, which is now assuming dangerous dimensions".

Bureau Report
http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=398822&sid=WOR&sname=&news=Fighting%20terror%20should%20not%20be%20Islamophobia:%20Uzbek%20FM

Islamophobia on the rise – UN report

Islamophobia on the rise – UN report

Islamophobia has been on the rise since the 9/11 attacks in the United States with Muslims living in Europe facing growing difficulties in carrying out their religious practices and establishing mosques, said a UN expert in racism.


"In the current context, Islamaphobia constitutes the most serious form of religious defamation," Doudou Diene, UN special rapporteur on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, said in a report to the UN Human Rights Council on September 14, reported Reuters.


"Political parties with open anti-Islamic platforms have joined governmental coalitions in several countries and started to put in place their political agendas," he said.


"In sum, Islamophobia is in the process of permeating all facets of social life."


He said recent lampooning cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) were an evidence on the rising Islamophobia in the West.


He said right-wing groups and the media are trying to equate Islam with violence and terrorism.


Some were seeking to "silence religious practices by banning the construction of mosques", he said.


Though Islam is the continent's second religion, Muslims across Europe are facing venomous campaigns against building stately mosques.


In Switzerland, the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC) has launched a campaign to ban the construction of minarets in the country.


A similar move is also underway in the German city of Cologne.


Some European parties were resorting to the language of fear and exclusion, scapegoating and targeting ethnic or religious minorities in general, and immigrants and refugees in particular, said Diene.


"We see the initiatives and activities of many groups and organisations which are working hard to bring about a war of civilisations."


A recent report by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia said that Muslim minorities in Europe face deep-seated discrimination in jobs, education and housing in addition to myriad barriers that give rise to feelings of hopelessness and exclusion.


The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) said the rising Islamophobia in the West was alarming.


"Recent acts of defamation in the shape of blasphemous sketches in Sweden and posters in Switzerland reinforce this conclusion," said Pakistan's envoy Masood Khan, speaking on behalf of the OIC


"Such blasphemy should not be encouraged in the name of freedom of expression," accusing the media of fueling fears of Muslims.


"The international media continues to use the misguided actions of a small extremist minority as an excuse to malign the entire Muslim world, as well as the religion of Islam," he said.


Spain will host a conference early October to discuss discrimination and intolerance toward Muslims.


The conference, held under the aegis of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, will investigate the "roots of intolerance towards Muslims, the consequences and the role of the media", said the Spanish Foreign Ministry in a statement.


Diene, who was appointed as an independent UN expert in 2002, was presenting a report on defamation of religions to the 47-member council.


The report also includes sections on anti-Semitism and other forms of religious or racial persecution around the world.

from

http://www.themuslimweekly.com/fullstoryview.aspx?NewsID=145F8243C05473108350550C&MENUID=INTNEWS&DESCRIPTION=International%20News

Tools We Need to Fight Terrorism

Thank you for the Oct. 2 editorial, "Judicial Pushback," pointing out recent judicial overreaching to curtail the use of national security letters (NSLs) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

Allowing disclosure of NSLs each time a records request is made will signal terrorists that we are on their trail and give them a road map to our anti-terrorism techniques. Raising the bar for intelligence-related records requests harks back to the mind-set that traditional law enforcement procedures are sufficient to fight terrorism. Al-Qaeda and Sept. 11, 2001, proved that wrong.

We must guard our civil liberties as vigorously as we fight terrorists, but we also have to balance this important principle with the need to give our intelligence and law enforcement personnel the tools they need to help keep us safe.

Congress has provided our intelligence agencies with the additional authority they need to identify and analyze terrorist threats, and we are working on a comprehensive modernization of the FISA laws to bring the laws in line with modern technology and threats.

I look forward to a serious debate about legitimate concerns while recognizing that the threat of attack remains.

KIT BOND

U.S. Senator (R-Mo.)

Washington

Haniyeh Urges Arab Leaders to Boycott Conference

GAZA CITY/RAMALLAH, 7 October 2007 — Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the Hamas government in Gaza, yesterday urged Arab leaders not to attend the US-hosted international peace conference in the fall.

In an interview with the Falasteen newspaper, Haniyeh said: “We are going to appeal directly to Arab brothers, mainly the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to reconsider any decision to participate in this conference.”

Haniyeh said he did not expect any concrete result from the conference as Israel had stuck to its stance on Jerusalem, the return of refugees and the 1967 borders.

“The Palestinians did not build much hope on the previous Oslo agreements,” Haniyeh said in the interview with the pro-Hamas daily, referring to the interim peace accords reached in the mid-1990s. “Therefore, we are not going to build any hope on the results of this conference,” he said.

Hamas issued a similar appeal late last month. Hamas has tried to stay on good terms with the Arab world.

The United States has not yet set a date for the conference or announced a list of participants. Both depend, in part, on how much progress Israeli and Palestinian teams will make in drafting a joint declaration of principles that would guide future talks on a final peace deal. The conference is to endorse such a document, and possibly relaunch peace talks that broke down in January 2001.

The head of the Palestinian negotiating team, Ahmed Qorei, said yesterday that if a joint Israeli-Palestinian statement was not formulated before the conference, the Palestinians might not participate in it.

He added that both teams would hold their first meeting tomorrow to draft a joint statement ahead of the conference.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minster Ehud Olmert, during their meeting on Wednesday in Jerusalem, gave a green light to the negotiating teams to start working on the joint statement.

Qorei, who is a member of Fatah’s Central Committee and a former Palestinian Authority prime minister, told Palestinian media that the two sides should agree before the summit, which Israeli officials say is set for Nov. 26, on a timetable for implementing agreements.

He also said that the principles of a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are clear to both sides, and now they simply must be worded into a serious, unambiguous document.

Qorei said that the internal Palestinian stalemate between his movement and Hamas “can no longer be allowed to prevent the resolution of the Palestinian issue.”

He warned that there was no room for confusion regarding the key issues of an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. “It is vital that in the next few days we reach agreements on these issues, which include Jerusalem, refugees, borders, water, settlements and prisoners.”

According to Israeli political sources, the statement may include references to the core issues of a final-status agreement on the establishment of a Palestinian state, but such references would be noncommittal, and the statement will deal only with issues that enjoy clear agreement.

The parties differ greatly on the results they would like the conference to yield, with Abbas looking for agreement on core issues while Olmert seeks a vague statement of interests.

Israeli officials said the statement would be “significant enough but general enough to avoid a blow-up or crisis.”

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is to arrive in Israel and the Palestinian territories next week to see if a joint statement can include the core issues.

from

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4&section=0&article=102138&d=7&m=10&y=2007