Sunday, October 7, 2007

NSW launches Terrorism and Homicide Victims Day

NSW will become the only state to mark an annual day of remembrance for victims of terrorism, the Bali bombings and other homicides after the Federal Government refused a request from victims' families.

The State Government will now go it alone, agreeing to requests to commemorate the anniversary of the 2002 Bali bombings.

The Daily Telegraph has learned that this Friday will now become the official NSW Terrorism and Homicide Victims Remembrance Day.

Premier Morris Iemma is believed to have agreed to the event after pressure from victims's groups and families, in particular Elaine Dawson whose sister and brother-in-law were murdered and nephew seriously wounded in 2000.

Ms Dawson has been lobbying the Federal Government for two years to have a national day of remembrance for victims of murder and terrorism.

Ms Dawson, who wrote to Prime Minister John Howard to no avail, has been snubbed by every state. Mr Howard told her a national remembrance day was something the states would have to do individually.

Since February Mr Iemma has been urging his state counterparts to agree to a nationwide day.

"If it brings additional peace to just one victim's family, then it is worth it," Mr Iemma said.

"NSW has discussed this proposal on a national level before and we would invite any other interested jurisdictions to join us in a formal declaration of October 12. This day marks the anniversary of the 2002 Bali bombings.

"As the anniversary of the first Bali bombing, October 12 is the most suitable date to remember those who died or were injured as a result of terrorism or violence."

Martha Jabor from the Homicide Victims of Crime Support Group said she had been negotiating with the Bali families who claim they have been waiting for this day.

Australian-born Natalie Juniardi, who lost her Indonesian husband John in the 2002 bombing, will mark the day with her two young sons in Bali. Since the bombing, she has stayed in Bali and is not leaving the place she has spent all her adult years. "I love it here. It's my home," she said.

from
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22548256-421,00.html

Modern Arabic Literature and Culture

Students who opt to concentrate on Modern Arabic should read the general requirements of "Arabic and Islamic Studies" and note the following (course) requirements: (1) Modern Arabic Literature: Four semesters of seminars and/or reading and research courses (Arabic 300/320r); (2) Classical Arabic Language/Literature: Arabic 240 (Classical Arabic philology; full-year course), and two semesters of classical literature/literary history (such as Arabic 150r/245r); (3) Literary Theory: Two semesters of literary theory in consultation with supervisory committee; (4) Second ME language: Four semesters of Modern Hebrew, Turkish, or Persian; (5) Electives in contemporary Arab studies: Two semesters of area studies that deal with contemporary Arab culture (history, anthropology, or religious studies)

from
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/arab_islam.html

Islamic intellectual history (especially philosophy and theology)

In addition to Islamic Civilizations 145 ("Islamic Philosophy and Theology") as well as a full year of Arabic 240 ("Classical Arabic Philology"), certain specified courses are required of all students who plan to write a dissertation on some aspect of Arabic/Islamic Philosophy (falsafa) or Islamic Theology (kalâm). The aim of these requirements is to give students the ability to locate a particular text more precisely within Islamic intellectual history: both diachronically (i.e., in terms of that text's relationship to previous and later texts within the text's own specific intellectual tradition, be it falsafa or kalâm) and synchronically (i.e., in terms of that text's relationship to contemporaneous texts within other textual traditions, be they Islamic Law, Qur'an Commentary; Sufism, etc.). Students planning to write on some aspect of Arabic/Islamic Philosophy (falsafa) will be required to complete at least two semesters of Arabic 249r ("Arabic Philosophical Texts: Seminar"); one semester of Arabic 250r ("Arabic Theological Texts: Seminar"); one undergraduate-level course on Ancient Philosophy (e.g., Classics 100, Philosophy 101; Philosophy 102, Philosophy 105); and one graduate-level course on Ancient Philosophy (e.g. Classics 268r; Greek 110r, Philosophy 202). By the time they take their General Examinations, students planning to write about some aspect of Arabic/Islamic philosophy will also be required to demonstrate - through examination or through completion of coursework with a grade of "B" or better - at least a third-year level of proficiency in Greek OR Latin OR Hebrew, depending on their specific interests. (NB: Students planning to write on some aspect of the Greco-Arabic translation movement will also be required to demonstrate at least a second-year level of proficiency in Syriac.) Students planning to write on some aspect of Islamic Theology (kalâm) will be required to complete at least two semesters of Arabic 250r ("Arabic Theological Texts: Seminar"); one semester of Arabic 249r ("Arabic Philosophical Texts: Seminar"); four courses in the following areas: Qur'an; Islamic Law; Institutional History; Hadith; Arabic Grammar; Sufism; or Late-Antique or Medieval Christian or Jewish Thought.

from
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/arab_islam.html

Islamic religion and culture

Electing this as an examination field involves developing (1) a general, synoptic grasp of the broad history of Islamic religion and culture with (2) a focus on two or three selected topical foci within that history, e.g., Qur'an and exegesis, Hadith studies, Sufism, law, reform, ritual and practice, theological developments, education, religion and politics, or religious institutions and ideas in a particular period and region. It is expected that anyone focusing on Islamic religion will at a minimum do one field in Arabic language and literature (above) and complete course work through the advanced level as specified there. In addition, two or more years of work in a second Islamic language and a minimum of five further courses in Islamic religion, history, literature, culture, art history, etc. is normally expected. These will come primarily from NELC, History, and History of Art and Architecture and Study of Religion, but there are often courses in other departments (e.g., Anthropology, Sanskrit and Indian Studies) or other faculties (e.g., Divinity or Law) that may be counted. Every student's precise curriculum in Islamic religion and culture is to be worked out with his or her adviser.

from
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/arab_islam.html

Arabic Language and Literature

This may count as one field in the General Examinations or as two separate fields. If students intend to write their thesis in either Arabic language or Arabic literature, they are required to take two separate examinations in these two fields. If they intend to write their thesis in fields (b) to (e) below, Arabic language and literature will count as one field for the General Examinations. Students with a focus on language are required to take Arabic 146r (History of the Arabic Languages) and Arabic 248r (Medieval Arabic Writings on Grammar [or Literary Theory]: Seminar). They are strongly encouraged to take introductory courses in Linguistics (such as Linguistics 110, 112a/b, 115, 120) and/or Semitic Philology (such as Sem. Philol. 140, 200r). Students focusing on literature are required to take Arabic 245r (Classical Arabic Literature: Seminar), ideally twice. If they feel they are still in need of a general overview, they are encouraged to take, or audit, Arabic 150r (History of Classical Arabic Literature [in translation]). It is also strongly recommended that they take a course or two in Comparative Literature (such as Comp. Lit. 112, 207, 211, 275). Students with a language focus should take, or audit, the literature courses (Arabic 150r and 245r) for their examination in Arabic literature; likewise, students with a literature focus should take, or audit, the courses on language (Arabic 146r and 248r) for their examination in Arabic language. Students who want to take the examination in Arabic language AND literature should take two and audit two of the Arabic courses mentioned (one course on language and one on literature, each). A fair knowledge of the foundational texts of Islam is required for all students in Arabic language and literature; those who do not come in with this kind of knowledge should take either Arabic 230a and 230b (The Hadith) or Arabic 231a and 231b (The Qur'an).

from
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/arab_islam.html

Arab Literature in English

Arabic Translation

Arab Literature in English

The late Edward Said used to complain of a tacit conspiracy against Arab literature in translation, a complaint supported by much anecdotal evidence. However it has to be considered in a wider context. The Anglo-Saxon world has not been hugely curious about the literatures of other cultures. nthusiasts for Dutch, Finnish, Korean or Chinese literature can make similar complaints about the neglect or marginalisation of those cultures.

One Thousand and One Nights


One Thousand and

One Nights

Both Arabs and western Arabists have argued that there are particular problems with Arabic literature. Arabic, as the language of revelation for Muslims, has a special prescriptive status among Muslims who comprise over 90% of Arabs. There have been arguments about alien cultural reference points. But an outstanding work of Arabic literature such as One Thousand and One Nights has become part of western culture. It has influenced writers such as Charles Dickens. The wildly derivative story of ‘Aladdin and his Magic Lamp’ is part of every child’s mental and imaginative furniture, and has been the subject of pantomimes in London for nearly 200 years. Moreover the literature of fantasy, science fiction – the writings of Tolkien and Philip Pullman – equally make demands on the imagination.

Some writings of contemporary Arabic have been accepted as part of the canon of international literature. The Cairo trilogy of the Egyptian Naguib Mahfouz has sold more copies in English than the whole of Mahfouz’s work in Arabic. The Sudanese Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North, first translated by Denys Johnson-Davies 40 years ago, has recently been republished as one of the Penguin Library of Modern Classics. Two other writers – the Lebanese Hanan al-Shaykh and the late Saudi Abdel-Rahman Munif – have been regularly published by mainstream western publishers.

But the great majority of contemporary Arab literature in the last 50 years has been published by niche publishers. Such publishers – Quartet Books and Saqi in the United Kingdom, Interlink, the University of Texas at Austin and Three Continents Press in the United States – have produced outstanding work. But their productions have had small print-runs and the publishing houses have lacked the resources of promotion and distribution of the larger mainstream publishers.

Today the leading publisher of contemporary Arabic literature in English is the American University in Cairo Press. Their list is excellent. They have now published the whole works of Naguib Mahfouz, covering nearly 70 years of creativity. Although there is an emphasis on Egyptian literature, the AUC Press has not neglected the rest of the Arab world. In the last 15 years, the quality of their productions has vastly improved. The Press distribute 80% of their publications from Cairo, 15% in the United States and only 5% in the United Kingdom and Europe. There are great possibilities for expansion there.

If we look at the increase of publications in the last 50 years we note that there was only a trickle of publications in the 50s, 60s and 70s. The award of the Nobel Prize for Literature to Naguib Mahfouz in 1988 transformed that. The global literary world became aware that Mahfouz was not the only writer. Each year from the 90s onwards, 20 or more works of contemporary Arab literature are published in English – in the United States, the United Kingdom and Egypt.

In the 1970s, a Palestinian poet and critic, Salma Khadra Jayyusi, set up the Project for the Translation of Arabic (PROTA). She cajoled money from various sources and has sponsored 20 or more volumes of Arabic in translation. She has persuaded several publishers to publish and, under PROTA, work has been published by the Palestinians Liana Badr and Yahya Yakhlif, the Libyan Ibrahim al-Koni, the Yemeni Zaid Mutee. Dr Jayyusi has also published several huge anthologies of contemporary literature, the most recent being Modern Arabic Fiction, over 1,000 pages long, published by Columbia University Press in 2005.

The other significant development has been the magazine, Banipal, which has appeared three times a year since 1998. Nearly 300 contemporary Arab authors have seen their work in English. The magazine has not been academic, but has included news stories, reviews, photographs, profiles as well as translations. Margaret Obank and Samuel Shimon have built up a unique network of writers and translators in all parts of the world. It has broken out of the restricted niche of Middle Eastern specialists and arranged successful tours around Britain of Arab writers such as Mourid Barghouti and Saadi Youssef. More recently it has been publishing collections of work that has appeared in the magazine. And most recently it has launched the Banipal Prize for Translation, with support from the poet from the United Arab Emirates, Muhammad al-Suwaidi. Last month it won an award for being the seventh (out of over 100) best literary magazine.

from
http://www.literarytranslation.com/workshops/arabictranslation/arabliteratureinenglish/

A brief History of Arabic Literature

A brief History of Arabic Literature

Iraq's modern Arabic literature in English translation: a preliminary bibliography - Modern Iraqi Literature in English Translation Arab Studies Quart

Iraq's modern Arabic literature in English translation: a preliminary bibliography - Modern Iraqi Literature in English Translation Arab Studies Quarterly (ASQ) - Find Articles

Arab Women in Literature

Arab Women in Literature

Islamic History in Arabia and Middle East

Islamic History in Arabia and Middle East

Classical Arabic prose

The birth of Arabic prose as a literary form is attributed to the Persian secretarial class who served under the Abbasid caliphs (750-1256) in Baghdad. Ibn al-Muqaffa' (died 757) was a convert to Islam who translated classical Persian works into Arabic. He became famous as the author of Kalila and Dimna, a series of didactic fables in which two jackals offer moral and practical advice.

al-JAHIZ (776-869) developed Arabic prose into a literary vehicle of precision and elegance. Born in Basrah, he was noted for his wit and became one of Baghdad's leading intellectuals during the early Abbasid period. The most famous of his 200 works were:

  • Kitab al-Hayawan ("The Book of Animals"), an anthology of animal anecdotes.

  • Kitab al-Bayan wa al-Tabyin ("The Book of Elucidation and Exposition"), ostensibly about rhetoric but also covering history and science.

  • Kitab al-Bukhala’ ("The Book of Misers"), amusing but perceptive observations on psychology.

ABU AL-FARAJ al-Isfahani (c 897-967), from Aleppo, wrote Kitab al-Aghani ("The Book of Songs"), in 24 volumes. A model of simplicity and clarity in its writing, the book gives a comprehensive picture of Arab culture and society, including songs and poems which were popular in Baghdad under the Caliph Harun al-Rashid. A vizir (government minister) of the time is said to have taken 30 camel-loads of books whenever he travelled - until he received a copy of the Book of Songs. He then felt able to dispense with all the other books.

al-HAMADHANI (died 1008) is credited with inventing the genre known as maqamat ("assemblies") - dramatic anecdotes narrated by a witty but unscrupulous rogue which poke fun at all levels of society. Elaborately written in rhyming prose, they exploit the unique capabilities of the Arabic language to the full. Out of 400 original maqamat, 52 survive.

The trend towards linguistic virtuosity led, ultimately, to a triumph of form over content. al-HARIRI (c 1054-1122) took the maqamah to new heights (or extremes) in order to demonstrate his prowess with word-play and his seemingly inexhaustible vocabulary. In one work, he used only those letters of the alphabet which have no dots or do not join to the following letter in a word. Even so, for more than seven centuries, al-Hariri's maqamat were regarded as the greatest literary treasure of Arabic, after the Qur'an. According to some readers, wholesome moral values and subtle criticisms of the existing social order underlie al-Hariri's decorative language.

from

http://www.al-bab.com/arab/literature/lit.htm

Pre-Islamic literature

The structure of the Arabic language is well-suited to harmonious word-patterns, with elaborate rhymes and rhythms. The earliest known literature emerged in northern Arabia around 500 AD and took the form of poetry which was recited aloud, memorised and handed down from one generation to another. It began to be written down towards the end of the seventh century. The most celebrated poems of the pre-Islamic period were known as the mu'allaqat ("the suspended"), reputedly because they were considered sufficiently outstanding to be hung on the walls of the ka'ba in Makkah.

The typical poem of this period is the qasidah (ode), which normally consists of 70-80 pairs of half-lines. Traditionally, they describe the nomadic life, opening with a lament at an abandoned camp for a lost love. The second part praises the poet's horse or camel and describes a journey, with the hardships it entails. The third section contains the main theme of the poem, often extolling the poet's tribe and villifying its enemies.

from

http://www.al-bab.com/arab/literature/lit.htm

Meet 14-year-old Maulima Fazil in quake-hit and remote Tangdhar

None Has So Far Accomplished Such A Feat At This Age


Khurdpara, (Tangdhar) Oct 6: Enter her house on the mountain base that can crumble in case of a shake like October 8, 2005 and the dingy rooms where she lives in perpetual darkness indicate the condition of the present of this bright 14-year-old girl who had splendid past and now fosters future of others through Islamic teachings as she has the rare honour of having a degree of Maulima Fazil at this young age.
Probably she is the only one who at the age of 13 has attained such a degree. Haseena finished the degree course in seven years in 2006.
14-year-old Haseena’s determination is as strong as the mountain where her mudstone house is situated and lies meters away from the danger zone or the flood way once rains turn incessant and God-forbid washes it away. But She has faith in Almighty whose relentless recitation she has been muttering ever since she spoke a word in the world and now after becoming Maulima Fazil continues to resonate through her tender voice. The entire area suffered extensive damage on October 8, 2005 and almost every house crumbled except Haseena’s, which only developed cracks.
Her story exemplifies how a tender soul in this remote border area struggles to attain such a feat with the help of mother, who has taken job of a sweeper for a paltry sum of Rs 200 at Govt School here. Even though she is not a permanent staffer yet manages her chores in this meager sum.
Haseena is the only daughter among the four children born to Zareena now 40 and widowed.
The abject poverty she is into at present has forced her to enroll two sons into orphanages in Srinagar.
Sajad, 12, has been enrolled in JK Yateem Khana at Batamaloo while Zubair, 8, is being taken care of at Baitul-Hilal Orphanage at Jawahar Nagar. The younger one Adil, 5, stays with Zareena here.
Life was not this way as the family struggles to sustain it.
Ghulam Mustafa Khan while following Prophet Muhammad (SAW’s) saying that ‘Go in quest of knowledge even into China’ in order to imbibe in his only daughter Haseena the Islamic education settled the entire family in Gujarat in 1993.
Khan owned a truck and used to ferry fruits to Gujarat with handsome earning. Since in the backdrop he had made up his mind to make Haseena an Aalim, he got his entire family settled in Gujarat.
Zareena reveals that Sajad was studying in an English medium school in Gujarat. “Look at our fate as he is now in a Yateem Khana,” moans she.
In 1999 Khan got Haseena admitted into Jamiat-u-Saulihaat, Bostaan Amina Munawara in Barauch district of Gujarat where she could learn from basics to attain the degree.
According to Zareena, Khan after driving trucks for years had the yearning to have his own TATA Sumo in Karnah for extra earning.
This, she says was the period when people started purchasing TATA Sumos in no other vehicle zone of Tangdhar and he in order to process the finance for the vehicle had to be here.
And Khan’s entry into his home here proved to be a turning point for the entire family as the ‘last shell’ fired from the artillery fell on Khan killing him instantly just in front of his house at Khurdpara, some 2 kms from Tangdhar.
Hardly did Pakistani and Indian leadership knew that their last artillery shell would rip apart this family’s bliss. Both countries announced ceasefire on the day the last shell smashed head of Khan.
“This shell fell on us and here we are as I am sweeper, my sons are in orphanages, my house is on verge of crumbling and at time we don’t have ration,” says Zareena. She further says that this year the school officials almost removed her from the temporary sweeper post but she fought to retain Rs 200 per month job.
It was after seven days of Khan’s burial that Zareena with children landed in Tangdhar from Gujarat. “We received the news of his death after days and couldn’t see his face before burial,” says Zareena with entire family in tears.
The burial of Khan saw the literal ‘burial’ of gladness of this family. However, Haseena’s Islamic education turned her into vanguard and she directed her family the way to survive amidst struggle.
Zareena took to sweeper’s job while Haseena went back to Gujarat to complete her father’s dream of becoming an Aalim.
It was in the year 2006 that Haseena finished her degree of Maulima Fazil. It took Haseena seven years to complete this degree.
During seven years, She first passed course in Arifa (two years) in which basic about holy Quran and Arabic is imparted, after Arifa, she passed Aalima (2 years) in which stress is on Hadith and for three years she did Fazila course.
In these seven years, she read Fiqh, Hadith books (Bukhari Sharief, Tirmizi Sharief and Ibne Majah), (Abu Dawood), (Riyazatus Saulihaen), Arab literature, Grammar and Language and also mastered Quranic translation.
After this degree, now Haseena is hell bent on pursuing her education to become Hafiz-e-Quran. It will take another year for Haseen to attain another feat.
Her mother doesn’t want Haseena to leave for Gujarat as she argues that she (Haseena) is not well with the health. “Yes I have health problems but InshaAllah I will be okay as I do Dhikr of Allah and I am going to Gujarat for further studies,” affirms she.
Zareena even pleads that she doesn’t have money to buy Haseena tickets for Gujarat. To this Haseena says that she has saved some amount during her teaching stint at Darasgah in Kandi and also teaches Quran to young boys and girls at home here. She receives salary of Rs 1000 per month at Darasgah.
Her determination to become Hafiz-e-Quran is evident when she argues with her mother to allow her to pursue it in Jamait-u-Saulihaut and soon she will be on her way to achieve another milestone in this world and hereafter.

SCFA receiving nominations for Children’s Literature Prize

SCFA receiving nominations for Children’s Literature Prize
Web posted at: 9/30/2007 2:56:3
Source ::: The Peninsula

DOHA • The Supreme Council for Family Affairs (SCFA) has started receiving nominations for its annual State's Prize for Children’s Literature, which was launched through an Emiri Decree in 2005.

Literary works competing for the prize have been received on SCFA's website childlit-qa@scfa.gov.qa which contains full information about the prize as well as a copy of the nomination form.

This award was launched with the aim of enriching child's literature in the Arab world, considering the scarcity of intellectual products concerned with childhood, a press release issued by SCFA said.

It also aims to contribute towards building a generation aware of its Arabic and Islamic identity and its cultural heritage and societal values, according to an announcement posted on the SCFA website.

The prize includes eight categories which are: short story, novel, poetry, acting, theatre, children's songs and illustrated books for children, in addition to innovated children's games, including those using electronic devices, the press release added.

The rize's value is QR200,000 for each of these categories and in case there is more than one winner in the same category, the sum will be divided equally between the winners.

Besides, the winners will be awarded with a gold medal and its patent, as well as a certificate of appreciation.

The work submitted to win the prize should be in Arabic and should be original and has not previously won any local, Arab or international prize.

It should also be inventive and consistent with Arabic and Islamic values in the Arab communities, and has not previously been submitted as a dissertation or a thesis to obtain an academic degree, the press release said.

The French Mediterranean Art Center celebrates Algerian literature

The French Mediterranean Art Center celebrates Algerian literature
on Thursday, October 04 @ 11:41:56 CDT

The French Mediterranean Art Centre has selected Algeria as a main theme for studies in a seminar slated for October 11th at Perpignan (Southern France). The theme of the seminar is “Algeria … Inter-crossed opinions on the foot steps of Albert Camus and Kateb Yacine.”.

The center started its activities 20 years in the south of France and succeeded in creating a festival in 2005. Within few years, it imposed itself on the French Literary scene. The festival “Read in the Mediterranean” celebrates artists who contributed in shaping the Mediterranean identity as well as its specificity.

Algeria will be represented through the play “1962” to its stage director Mohammed Gacimi as well as through the screening of some Algerian movies for instance the French –Moroccan film “the brother enemy” in which the Algerian comic Mohammed Fellag played a part.

The organizers of this year’s edition decided to celebrate the French academician Dominique Fernandez, whereas Assia Djebbar, the first African and Arab world woman to enter the French academy was not invited.

Agencies
http://www.echoroukonline.com/english/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7846

Director captures origins of terrorism

Oil, Allah, vengeance -- and a socko car bombing that seems to detonate in your lap: "The Kingdom" hits you hard.

Starring Jamie Foxx and Jennifer Garner as FBI agents investigating a terrorist attack on Americans in Saudi Arabia, the film is sort of a faster, bloodier, more ruthlessly linear "Syriana."
The first couple of minutes especially caught our attention. They're given over to a lightning-speed, multimedia CliffsNotes version of events in U.S.-Saudi history -- oil springs out of the sand, America races in to suck it up, cozying up to the royal family, then fundamentalists see their country run amok with nonbelievers, yada, yada, boom: 9/11 happens.
We asked director Peter Berg about mainlining history along with violence and suspense.
Q: Why did you begin with that rundown of events in Saudi Arabia?
A: People don't know that 17 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi; they thought they were from Iraq. They don't know Osama bin Laden was from Saudi Arabia; they thought he was from Iraq. I felt we needed to make them realize that Saudi Arabia is important and relevant to their lives. But in a world where we're so obsessed with Lindsay Lohan's driving and Paris Hilton's driving, I guess it's not surprising that people don't think that much about Saudi Arabia.
Q: What made you think audiences expecting a guns-blazing action pic would digest a straight shot of sociopolitical history?
A: I think audiences are smart, and I think if you make it entertaining, they can take in anything. I liken it to getting a child to do homework. I have a 7-year-old son, and under the right circumstances, he'll do anything.
Q: Are we more primed for the fact-based tick-tock because of the success of "An Inconvenient Truth"?
A: I did talk to the company (that developed the opening sequence) and said, look, if "An Inconvenient Truth" can make global warming appealing, we should be able to make U.S.-Saudi relations, in three minutes, compelling.
Q: "The Kingdom" bears a pretty dark message about the future of U.S.-Arab relations. What's it going to take to break the cycle of violence?
A: Look at countries that are thriving in the Middle East, like Dubai -- capitalism is working in Dubai. Capitalism is policing the country. They're creating a climate that is business-friendly. If you don't have that, people will keep blowing themselves up because they have nothing to lose.
So we have to encourage investment opportunities in Iraq, Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia.
Q: In those opening minutes of "The Kingdom," you make the case that 9/11 is explainable. That its roots can be traced back to clashing views and that the terrorists are not just crazies wanting their 77 virgins when they die. But don't you risk turning off audiences by humanizing the terrorists?
A: For sure, they're not just crazy people, and the roots do go way back. . . . But to not humanize them is to ignore them, and to ignore them is to become vulnerable.

By Sarah Kaufman

from
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071007/ENTERTAINMENT03/710070309/1005/ENTERTAINMENT

THE ARCHITECTS OF WAR: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

President Bush has not fired any of the architects of the Iraq war. In fact, a review of the key planners of the conflict reveals that they have been rewarded — not blamed — for their incompetence.

PAUL WOLFOWITZ

Role In Going To War: Wolfowitz said the U.S. would be greeted as liberators, that Iraqi oil money would pay for the reconstruction, and that Gen. Eric Shinseki’s estimate that several hundred thousand troops would be needed was “wildly off the mark.” [Washington Post, 12/8/05; Wolfowitz, 3/27/03]

Where He Is Now: Bush promoted Wolfowitz to head the World Bank in March 2005. Two years into his five-year term, Wolfowitz was rebuked by the World Bank investigative committee for engineering an unethical pay and promotion package for his girlfriend and, after repeated calls for his resignation, stepped down on May 17, 2007. Wolfowitz is now a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-wing think tank that “has the President’s ear” on national security issues. [Washington Post, 3/17/05, 5/18/07; Financial Times, 6/28/07]

Key Quote: “The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason [for going to war].” [USA Today, 5/30/03]

DOUGLAS FEITH

Role In Going To War: As Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Feith spearheaded two secretive groups at the Pentagon — the Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group and the Office of Special Plans — that were instrumental in drawing up documents that explained the supposed ties between Saddam and al Qaeda. The groups were “created in order to find evidence of what Wolfowitz and his boss, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, believed to be true.” Colin Powell referred to Feith’s operation as the Gestapo. In Bob Woodward’s Plan of Attack, former CentCom Commander Gen. Tommy Franks called Feith the “f***ing stupidest guy on the face of the earth.” [LAT, 1/27/05; NYT, 4/28/04; New Yorker, 5/12/03; Plan of Attack, p.281]

Where He Is Now: Feith voluntarily resigned from the Defense Department shortly after Bush’s reelection. He is currently writing a memoir of his Pentagon work and teaching a course at Georgetown University “on the Bush Administration’s strategy behind the war on terrorism.” The Defense Department’s Inspector General found that Feith’s secretive groups at the Pentagon “developed, produced, and then disseminated” deceptive intelligence that contradicted “the consensus of the Intelligence Community.” These groups are still under investigation by the Senate Intelligence Committee. [Washington Post, 1/27/05;Georgetown press release, 5/1/06; NYT, 2/9/07]

Key Quote: “I am not asserting to you that I know that the answer is — we did it right. What I am saying is it’s an extremely complex judgment to know whether the course that we chose with its pros and cons was more sensible.” [Washington Post, 7/13/05]

STEPHEN HADLEY

Role In Going To War: As then-Deputy National Security Advisor, Hadley disregarded memos from the CIA and a personal phone call from Director George Tenet warning that references to Iraq’s pursuit of uranium be dropped from Bush’s speeches. The false information ended up in Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address. [Washington Post, 7/23/03]

Where He Is Now: On January 26, 2005, Stephen Hadley was promoted to National Security Advisor. [White House bio]

Key Quote: “I should have recalled at the time of the State of the Union speech that there was controversy associated with the uranium issue. … And it is now clear to me that I failed in that responsibility in connection with the inclusion of these 16 words in the speech that he gave on the 28th of January.” [Hadley, 7/22/03]

RICHARD PERLE

Role In Going To War: Richard Perle, the so-called “Prince of Darkness,” was the chairman of Defense Policy Board during the run-up to the Iraq war. He suggested Iraq had a hand in 9-11. In 1996, he authored “Clean Break,” a paper that was co-signed by Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and others that argued for regime change in Iraq. Shortly after the war began, Perle resigned from the Board because he came under fire for having relationships with businesses that stood to profit from the war. [Guardian, 9/3/02, 3/28/03; AFP, 8/9/02]

Where He Is Now: Currently, Perle is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute where he specializes in national security and defense issues. He has been investigated for ethical violations concerning war profiteering and other conflicts of interest. [Washington Post, 9/1/04]

Key Quote: “And a year from now, I’ll be very surprised if there is not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush. There is no doubt that, with the exception of a very small number of people close to a vicious regime, the people of Iraq have been liberated and they understand that they’ve been liberated. And it is getting easier every day for Iraqis to express that sense of liberation.” [Perle, 9/22/03]

ELLIOT ABRAMS

Role In Going To War: Abrams was one of the defendants in the Iran-Contra Affair, and he pled guilty to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress. He was appointed Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs during Bush’s first term, where he served as Bush’s chief advisor on the Middle East. His name surfaced as part of the investigation into who leaked the name of a undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame. [Washington Post, 5/27/03, 2/3/05]

Where He Is Now: Abrams was promoted to deputy national security adviser in February of 2005. In that position, he has led a smear campaign to attack Speaker Nancy Pelosi for visiting Syria. [Slate, 2/17/05; IPS, 4/9/07; Washington Post, 2/15/07]

Key Quote: “We recognize that military action in Iraq, if necessary, will have adverse humanitarian consequences. We have been planning over the last several months, across all relevant agencies, to limit any such consequences and provide relief quickly.” [CNN, 2/25/03]

SCOOTER LIBBY

libby

Role In Going To War: As Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, Libby repeatedly pressured CIA analysts to report that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and links to al Qaeda. He also provided classified government information to New York Times reporter Judith Miller that formed the basis of a series of articles highlighting Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction that were later entirely discredited. Along with Hannah, Libby was a principal author of the discredited draft UN presentation. [Washington Post, 6/5/03; National Journal, 4/6/06; FAIR, 3/19/07; NYT, 10/30/05]

Where He Is Now: On June 5, 2007, Libby was sentenced to 2.5 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for perjury and obstruction of justice for his role in the CIA leak case. On July 2, 2007, Bush commuted Libby’s prison sentence, ensuring he would serve no time in jail. [NYT, 6/5/07; Bush, 7/2/07]

Key Quote: “I’m a great fan of the Vice President,” Libby told Larry King in 2002. “I think he’s one of the smartest, most honorable people I’ve ever met.” [Time, 10/28/05]

JOHN HANNAH

johnhannahpiccropped2.jpg

Role In Going To War: As deputy national security advisor to Vice President Cheney, Hannah served as the conduit between Ahmad Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress and the Bush administration, passing along false information about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction that the administration relied upon to justify the invasion. Hannah was also a principal author of the draft speech making the administration’s case for war to the UN. Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and CIA director George Tenet rejected most of the content of the speech as exaggerated and unwarranted. [Newsweek, 12/15/06; NYT, 10/30/05]

Where He Is Now: On October 31, 2005, Cheney promoted Hannah to national security advisor, replacing the role served previously by Scooter Libby. [CNN, 10/31/05]

Key Quote: Reprising his role in misleading the country to war with Iraq, Hannah has told a U.S. ambassador that 2007 is “the year of Iran” and that a U.S. attack is “a real possibility.” [Washington Post, 2/11/07]

DAVID WURMSER

Role In Going To War: At the time of the war, Wurmser was a special assistant to John Bolton in the State Department. Wurmser has long advocated the belief that both Syria and Iraq represented threats to the stability of the Middle East. In early 2001, Wurmser had issued a call for air strikes against Iraq and Syria. Along with Perle, he is considered a main author of “Clean Break.” [Asia Times, 4/17/03; Guardian, 9/3/02]

Where He Is Now: Wurmser was promoted to Principal Deputy Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs; he is in charge of coordinating Middle East strategy. His name has been associated with the Plame Affair and with an FBI investigation into the passing of classified information to Chalabi and AIPAC. [Raw Story, 10/19/05; Washington Post, 9/4/04]

Key Quote: “Syria, Iran, Iraq, the PLO and Sudan are playing a skillful game, but have consistently worked to undermine US interests and influence in the region for years, and certainly will continue to do so now, even if they momentarily, out of fear, seem more forthcoming.” [Washington Post, 9/24/01]

ANDREW NATSIOS

Role In Going To War: Shortly after the invasion of Iraq, Andrew Natsios, then the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, went on Nightline and claimed that the U.S. contribution to the rebuilding of Iraq would be just $1.7 billion. When it became quickly apparent that Natsios’ prediction would fall woefully short of reality, the government came under fire for scrubbing his comments from the USAID Web site. [Washington Post, 12/18/03; ABC News, 4/23/03]

Where He Is Now: Natsios stepped down as the head of USAID in January and was teaching at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh’s School of Foreign Service as a Distinguished Professor in the Practice of Diplomacy and Advisor on International Development. In September 2006, Bush appointed him Special Envoy for Darfur. [AP, 2/20/06; Georgetown, 12/2/05; Washington Post, 9/19/06]

Key Quote: “[T]he American part of this will be $1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this.” [Nightline, 4/23/03]

DAN BARTLETT

bartlett

Role In Going To War: Dan Bartlett was the White House Communications Director at the time of the war and was a mouthpiece in hyping the Iraq threat. Bartlett was also a regular participant in the weekly meetings of the White House Iraq Group (WHIG). The main purpose of the group was the systematic coordination of the “marketing” of going to war with Iraq as well as selling the war here at home. [Washington Post, 8/10/03]

Where He Is Now: Bartlett announced his resignation on June 1, 2007 to pursue his “prospects in the private sector.” He was promoted to Counselor to the President on January 5, 2005, and was responsible for the formulation of policy and implementation of the President’s agenda. [Washington Post, 6/2/07]

Key Quote: “Most people would argue we are part of the solution in Iraq, not part of the problem.” [CNN, 10/23/06]

MITCH DANIELS

Role In Going To War: Mitch Daniels was the director of the Office of Management and Budget from January 2001 through June of 2003. In this capacity, he was responsible for releasing the initial budget estimates for the Iraq War which he pegged at $50 to $60 billion. The estimated cost of the war, including the full economic ramifications, is approaching $1 trillion. [MSNBC, 3/17/06]

Where He Is Now: In 2004, Daniels was elected Governor of Indiana. [USA Today, 11/3/04]

Key Quote: Mitch Daniels had said the war would be an “affordable endeavor” and rejected an estimate by the chief White House economic adviser that the war would cost between $100 billion and $200 billion as “very, very high.” [Christian Science Monitor, 1/10/06]

GEORGE TENET

Role In Going To War: As CIA Director, Tenet was responsible for gathering information on Iraq and the potential threat posted by Saddam Hussein. According to author Bob Woodward, Tenet told President Bush before the war that there was a “slam dunk case” that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction. Tenet remained publicly silent while the Bush administration made pre-war statements on Iraq’s supposed nuclear program and ties to al Qaeda that were contrary to the CIA’s judgments. Tenet issued a statement in July 2003, drafted by Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, taking responsibility for Bush’s false statements in his State of the Union address. [CNN, 4/19/04; NYT, 7/22/05]

Where He Is Now: Tenet voluntarily resigned from the administration on June 3, 2004. He was later awarded a Presidential Medal of Freedom. He released a memoir in April 2007 critical of many in the Bush administration for their roles in the Iraq war and currently teaches at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh’s School of Foreign Service. [Washington Post, 6/3/04; CBS, 4/29/07]

Key Quote: “It’s a slam dunk case.” [CNN, 4/19/04]

COLIN POWELL

Role In Going To War: Despite stating in Feb. 2001 that Saddam had not developed “any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction,” Powell made the case in front of the United Nations for a United States-led invasion of Iraq, stating that, “There can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more. And he has the ability to dispense these lethal poisons and diseases in ways that can cause massive death and destruction.” [Powell, 2/5/03; Powell, 2/24/01]

Where He Is Now: Shortly after Bush won reelection in 2004, Powell resigned from the administration. Powell now sits on numerous corporate boards. He succeeded Henry Kissinger in May 2006 as Chairman of the Eisenhower Fellowship Program at the City College of New York. In September 2005, Powell said of his U.N. speech that it was a “blot” on his record. He went on to say, “It will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It’s painful now.” [ABC News, 9/9/05]

Key Quote:
“‘You are going to be the proud owner of 25 million people,’ he told the president. ‘You will own all their hopes, aspirations, and problems. You’ll own it all.’ Privately, Powell and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage called this the Pottery Barn rule: You break it, you own it.” [Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack]

DONALD RUMSFELD

Role In Going To War: Prior to the war, Rumsfeld repeatedly suggested the war in Iraq would be short and swift. He said, “The Gulf War in the 1990s lasted five days on the ground. I can’t tell you if the use of force in Iraq today would last five days, or five weeks, or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that.” He also said, “It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.” [Rumsfeld, 11/14/02; USA Today, 4/1/03]

Where He Is Now: After repeated calls for his resignation, Donald Rumsfeld finally stepped down on November 8, 2006, one day after the 2006 midterm elections. Rumsfeld is now “working on setting up a new foundation…to promote continued U.S. engagement in world affairs in furtherance of U.S. security interests” so that he can “remain engaged in public policy issues.” He is also shopping a memoir, in the hopes of receiving “a large cash advance.” [AP, 11/8/06; Reuters, 3/19/06; Washington Times, 5/18/07; NY Sun, 6/27/07]

Key Quote: “You go to war with the Army you have. They’re not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time.” [CNN, 12/9/04]

CONDOLEEZZA RICE

Role In Going To War: As National Security Adviser, Rice disregarded at least two CIA memos and a personal phone call from Director George Tenet stating that the evidence behind Iraq’s supposed uranium acquisition was weak. She urged the necessity of war because “we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” [Washington Post, 7/27/03; CNN, 9/8/02]

Where She Is Now: In December of 2004, Condoleezza Rice was promoted to Secretary of State. [ABC News, 11/16/04]

Key Quote: “We did not know at the time — maybe someone knew down in the bowels of the agency — but no one in our circles knew that there were doubts and suspicions that this might be a forgery. Of course it was information that was mistaken.” [Meet the Press, 6/8/03]

DICK CHENEY

Role In Going To War: Among a host of false pre-war statements, Cheney claimed that Iraq may have had a role in 9/11, stating that it was “pretty well confirmed” that 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligence officials. Cheney also claimed that Saddam was “in fact reconstituting his nuclear program” and that the U.S. would be “greeted as liberators.” [Meet the Press, 12/9/01, 3/16/03]

Where He Is Now: Cheney earned another four years in power when Bush won re-election in 2004. Despite some conservatives calling for him to be replaced, Cheney has said, “I’ve now been elected to a second term; I’ll serve out my term.” Cheney continues to advocate for preemptive military intervention, recently delivering threats toward Iran in a speech aboard an aircraft carrier off Iran’s coast. [CBS Face the Nation, 3/19/06; NYT, 5/11/07]

Key Quote: “I think they’re in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency.” [Larry King Live, 6/20/05]

GEORGE W. BUSH

Role In Going To War: Emphasizing Saddam Hussein’s supposed stockpile of weapons of mass destruction, supposed ties to al Qaeda, and supposed nuclear weapons program, Bush built public support for — and subsequently ordered — an invasion of Iraq. [State of the Union, 1/28/03]

Where He Is Now: In November 2004, Bush won re-election. Since that time, popular support for the war and the President have reached a low point — nearing the levels of Richard Nixon during Watergate. [Chicago Sun-Times, 6/19/07]

Key Quote: “Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” [Bush, 10/7/02]

from

http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/

Right Wing Attacks Zakaria For Stating Facts About Ethnic Cleansing In Iraq

On ABC’s World News with Charles Gibson on Wednesday, Newsweek International editor Fareed Zakaria said that fears of genocide in Iraq after an American withdrawal are misplaced because large-scale ethnic cleansing has already occurred:

One of the dirty little secrets about Iraq is that Iraq has increasingly been ethnically cleansed. It’s sad to say, but the American Army has presided over the largest ethnic cleansing in the world since the Balkans. When people say bad things are going to happen if we leave, bad things have already happened. Where were you for the last four years?

Retired Gen. Jack Keane, one of the architects of Bush’s escalation plan, attacked Zakaria’s fact-based assertion. “You are really not describing what’s happening in Iraq. I mean, you’re in the past, to be quite frank about it,” said Keane before claiming the “surge” is working. Watch it:

Keane’s response to Zakaria has been heralded by the right wing. NewsBusters championed the “rebuke.” The Media Research Center, NewsBuster’s parent organization, approvingly reprinted the post in a cyber alert. The Washington Times’ Greg Pierce highlighted the exchange today.

None of Keane’s supporters note, however, that Zakaria is correct on the facts when he says “Iraq has increasingly been ethnically cleansed.”

Since the initial invasion of Iraq, more than 4.2 million Iraqis have left their homes, with roughly 2.2 million internally displaced while more than 2 million have fled to neighbouring states. Bush’s escalation, which Keane calls “very very encouraging,” has actually increased the pace of ethnic cleansing.

As the Center for American Progress’ Brian Katulis and Anita Sharma write today, the situation in Iraq now comprises “the biggest refugee crisis in the middle east since 1948.” But you won’t learn that reading right-wing diatribes against Zakaria.

Transcript:

CHARLES GIBSON: If we go through some sort of a reduction strategy, are we opening things up for some kind of genocide, ethnic cleansing, that will go on, and we’ll simply have 50, 60, 70,000 troops standing by and watching this?

FAREED ZAKARIA, NEWSWEEK INTERNATIONAL: No, because one of the dirty little secrets about Iraq is that Iraq has increasingly been ethnically cleansed. It’s sad to say, but the American Army has presided over the largest ethnic cleansing in the world since the Balkans. When people say bad things are going to happen if we leave, bad things have already happened. Where were you for the last four years?

RICHARD HAASS, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: But we should be realistic. Iraq is likely to be a messy and slightly dysfunctional country for the foreseeable future.

GEN. JACK KEANE, RETIRED: Both of you are really not describing what’s happening in Iraq. I mean, you’re in the past, to be quite frank about it. The Sunni insurgency has gone through a conversion. They have thrown the towel in. They have now saddled up along side of us, and they want to protect their communities, but they don’t want separate militia to do it. They’re going to do it as members of the Iraqi security forces, which is very, very encouraging.

from

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/07/zakaria-attacked-cleansing/